Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/17/07 23:12
Read: times


 
#144724 - re: OP Update
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Russ Cooper said:
Every time I reconnect the USB programming cable to my PC, Windows acts all surprised, says "new hardware found", and proceeds to install the same drivers and whatnot that it did two minutes earlier. Somehow this doesn't seem right.


That's ... odd. I assume that the cable is always in the same port on the computer. Must be digilent's (or Xilinx') stupid drivers.

The original Xilinx "Hi, I'm alive" program must reside in non-volatile memory somewhere, since it's rarin' to go every time the board powers up. When I put my program onto the board, however, it doesn't survive a power down. So I must be missing a step somewhere that's needed to store it into flash.


Indeed the original program IS stored somewhere. There's a Xilinx configuration EPROM on the board (look for the wide 20-pin SOIC marked "XCF02..." or "XCF04...").

The FPGAs have a handful of different configuration modes. When the board is powered it, the part configures itself from an on-board EPROM. This is called "master serial" mode. When you configure it using your cable, you are using JTAG mode.

I assume you're using the Xilinx iMPACT tool. iMPACT does a lot of things. You can use it to generate a PROM file (usually a .mcs) that is used by an EPROM burner to program the EPROM. You can then use iMPACT to program the EPROM using that file you just generated. Also you can use it to directly configure the EPROM. So unless you actually re-program the EPROM you will always power-up with the default "Hello World!" configuration.

There should be a Xilinx doc that explains how to use iMPACT.

Sooner or later, I'm going to want to abandon the IDE-like environment that Xilinx provides and move (some would probably say "revert") to a more automatic setup involving "make" or some batch files or something similar. I haven't seen how to do that yet, but I suspect that there must be a collection of commad line programs somewhere that is actually doing all the real work.


Yep, the GUI calls a series of programs to do all of the work, and there should be a command log generated. Unfortunately, the Xilinx GUI is stupider than a brick and spews temporary files in your project directory so you'll have to look for it (it has an obvious name).

If that's the case, it shouldn't be a big trick to set up batch processing of some sort.


It's not a big trick, but it's still a trick. I have a standard Makefile that I use with my FPGA projects, but it depends on some other Xilinx configuration and project files (one for the synthesis, of course the .UCF for constraints, and another file for BitGen). I also set up my projects so that the VHDL sources are NOT in the same directory as the Xilinx project, and you have to tell the ISE to NOT copy your sources to the project directory. Plus there are certain "gotchas" like how XST wants the part number string in a certain format but the back-end tools want it in a slightly-different format.

Oh, BTW: I run my makefile in a Cygwin shell rather than in the Windows cmd.exe, because it just works better.

But I suppose that while you're learning how to set up the various options (and there's a zillion of 'em), it's best to use the GUI. Just make sure you keep your sources separate from the ISE project directory.

One more thing: the fookin' ISE project file is huge and changes every time you open the project (even if you don't change any thing) so putting it into a revision-control system is a non-starter.

Good luck.

-a

List of 147 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Getting Started With FPGAs, Part II            01/01/70 00:00      
   I didn't find it too big a job ... YMMV, of course            01/01/70 00:00      
   when it doesnt work            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'd guess...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Curses            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 1 of ???            01/01/70 00:00      
      On your way ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Not windows this time?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not Windows every time, anyway            01/01/70 00:00      
      re: OP Update            01/01/70 00:00      
         what might be helpful before you get too far along            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 2 of ???            01/01/70 00:00      
      re: update            01/01/70 00:00      
         The Verilog == C trap            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: The Verilog == C trap            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thinking hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I read somewhere ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: Thinking Hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
               One reason why HDL isnt the same as software            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Have I got this right?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     re: Have I got this right?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        re: re: Have I got this right?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re: OT            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nothing\'s perfect            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The thing to watch with FPGA's            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 3 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      have you looked at the resource utilization?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Just a little bit            01/01/70 00:00      
            On a slightly different note..            01/01/70 00:00      
               the lesson ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               HDL coding to "help" the synthesizer            01/01/70 00:00      
         Please clarify            01/01/70 00:00      
            think hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
               this sounds like...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: this sounds like            01/01/70 00:00      
               Please clarify again            01/01/70 00:00      
                  for purpose of understanding ... YES            01/01/70 00:00      
                  answer            01/01/70 00:00      
      double assignment            01/01/70 00:00      
         Good catch, I think            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: Good Catch            01/01/70 00:00      
      block vs nonblocking            01/01/70 00:00      
         I have unplugged my eval board            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: Unplugged            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 4 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Another question about the counter            01/01/70 00:00      
         what's wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
            \'initial\' block            01/01/70 00:00      
               general Verilog coding advice            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow            01/01/70 00:00      
            Where does "reset" come from?            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Dumb Question 1 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      look at it in the other way            01/01/70 00:00      
         But isn\'t it out of spec?            01/01/70 00:00      
            If you look more closely at the spec ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         which tools?            01/01/70 00:00      
            fanout exceeded            01/01/70 00:00      
               device dependence            01/01/70 00:00      
      newer data sheet?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Metastability            01/01/70 00:00      
         ... and contact bounce            01/01/70 00:00      
            That might not be a worry ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 5 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      do you mean, adaptive threshold?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
            PicoBlaze            01/01/70 00:00      
               Andy ... about that PicoBlaze ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: about picoblaze            01/01/70 00:00      
         the boundary is quite arbitrary            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 6 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      a better way            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 7 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      OP Update 7.01            01/01/70 00:00      
         excessive skew warning            01/01/70 00:00      
            Offensive code here            01/01/70 00:00      
               On a slightly different note            01/01/70 00:00      
                  whatizit?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  free vs paid-for ModelSim            01/01/70 00:00      
               reason for the skew warning            01/01/70 00:00      
                  error            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I\\\'m drinking from a fire hose!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     fIREHOSE            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Faucet            01/01/70 00:00      
                           faucet            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Slow drip            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I have no particular interest in this - but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Famous last words...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       sure, I take your point - but            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 What libraries you use in VHDL            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    std_logic_arith vs numeric_std            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I found the FM!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Development System Reference Guide            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Another slow drip            01/01/70 00:00      
                              doubts            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I am not surprised it doesn\'t find that            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I was surprised            01/01/70 00:00      
                              If you want to see how the logic was synthesized            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Don't cares worked for me            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Not quite what I meant            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Bummer            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I wouldn't worry about minimizing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
                              re: drip            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 re: re: drip            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       re: huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          defaults?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             re: defaults?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             ***** Interesting result! ******            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          challenge            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             unknown is not don't care            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                A noob question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   similar noob question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      re: what happens            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   You should get a latch            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   re: a noob question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Not really answered            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         I'd guess...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Simulator question            01/01/70 00:00      
                              what you are seeing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Thanks, Jez            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    check the logic!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       That's good news            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          this might make the key difference            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Two flavors of \"big\"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                drop the comments :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             as has been recommended ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          My confidence in XILINX' simulator is low            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Xilinx vs. ModelSim            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                It's worth using ModelSim just for the features            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          behavioral is good,kind of            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             re: behavioral is good, kind of            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Double post. Oops.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 not so simple            01/01/70 00:00      
                              re: Simulator Question: ANSWER            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 re: ANSWER            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 re: ANSWER, Part II            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Long time            01/01/70 00:00      
      one more comment            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 8 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      its supposed to make things easier to debug            01/01/70 00:00      
      one way vs the other way            01/01/70 00:00      
         re: Them two ways            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 9 of ?            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update 10 of 10            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List