??? 12/22/10 17:31 Read: times |
#180234 - Yeah, okay Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Peters said:
So are you willing to bet your product design and your reputation on a deliberate misuse of the part because in one case it "works?"
That's the problem. Glad you asked. Hi Andy, I've just recently migrated towards using AVR's reasons being that the AVR is some 4x faster than the AT89C51ED2 that I have been using. The reason I'm looking for high speed is that I am getting very serious with DSP intensive applications and require a real need for speed. Using the 20 mip AVR, I can sample at about 30ks/sec, whilst increasing the max. clock further by x1.5, the sample rate increases towards 50ks/sec and the chip appears stable. At the moment, I'm merely enunciating this fact that the AVR is easily overclockable, this something which is difficult to do with the 12/6clock '51 due to an already high crystal(s) in normal use. It's true what has already been said by you and others, I would never overclock a commercial product. Cheers for now JA |