??? 10/21/06 17:28 Read: times |
#126870 - "bank switching no0t needed" Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So, sorry Erik, the general statement "bank switching no0t needed" is not true and I'm slightly annoyed to find me arguing on this level. I'd like to re-emphasize that the scheme I proposed in the posting to which you responded causes a significantly lower overhead than the switching mechanism used nowadays. |