??? 10/20/06 19:59 Read: times |
#126836 - not really - look out Responding to: ???'s previous message |
By using a separate flash chip, I get a better reliability than by using an embedded flash chip within the same die.
I have seen NO problems with "flash reliability within the same die". What happens again and again is that during power DOWN (the usual RC reset takes care of 99.87% of the power UP problems) the processor does strange things in its "death throes" which, ocasionally, lead it to write to the flash. THAT is why you need a 'real' reset when using flash. I am talking about 1,000,000 write cycles and 20 year data retention, and you generally can't get those numbers in a hybrid process and who gives a friggin hoot. We talk about 'non-volatile storage' and if you are to update the code 1,000,000 times, you will, pretty soon, stop buying chips. For data storage that number is outright dangerous. It will lead many to disregard the "wear-out" of the flash and, when they get 'surprised' they will blame the chip (That happened here). Erik |