??? 10/10/06 21:49 Read: times |
#126151 - Intel called them single-chip microcomputers Responding to: ???'s previous message |
and their reason was that they were self-contained, aside from the oscillator and power supply. They invented the concept. The i8048 was the first of them, wasn't it? The preceding microcontrollers were chip-sets, IIRC.
A computer consists of a CPU, memory, and I/O. If all that's on one chip, it's a single-chip-microcomputer. If it's called a microcontroller, it's probably a single-chip-micromputer. There were microcontrollers, e.g. the 8X300, that used multiple chips, in fact MANY chips. When there's an 805x-core MCU that contains a full complement of both CODE and DATA memory, i.e. 64KB of each, then we won't need external memory busses any longer. In the meantime, we're stuck with that mux'd bus or one of the many-pinned versions that doesn't mux 'em. Sadly, each time we use the mux'd bus, we lose two of the four ports on the standard MCU. What I see as really GOOD on the 805x family is that its external memory can be implemented. Ports can always be added via the external memory bus. RE |