??? 02/13/12 17:42 Read: times |
#185903 - the particular hobbyist in question Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
The wide supply range and DIP availability might be more valuable for a hobbyist than OCD, especially for a knowledgeable one. But, by his own confession, the particular hobbyist in question here is not a "knowledgeable" one: Scott Navarre said:
Hi, I am new here and am just getting started with the 8051. Further, from his experience so far, he is used to having the kind of direct debug access that OCD offers: I have been studying and using Keil's evaluation compiler to practice writing Embedded C applications and running them in the simulator. Therefore, I think it makes far more sense for him to, at least, start his "real hardware" experience on something with full OCD facilities. Once he's gained some comfort with "real hardware" he could, of course, try leaving the security of OCD... As Michael (among others?) has suggested many times, it can make a great deal of sense to start any development on an OCD-capable chip - and then move over to the "real" target once you have the code in a suitable state... |