Discussing ARMs on 8052.com...? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Same same... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
positive | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SevensAndNines... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sevens and Nines | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Try the chat here then | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I really want to discuss it here | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
for me is ok and interesting :-) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
nevermind at least | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
OK | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Scope of the forum | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
on other hand | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I have to agree | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Flaw in the argument | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Fresh blood is needed | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the closest thing to ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
But related to Keil tools | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not really policed - yet... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Actually well policed and few to answer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
"Policed"? [ed] | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not by Keil | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Agreed. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what I said | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's what should happen here | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not a suitable platform | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
i vote aye | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
second the motion | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a nice typo... or intention? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
re: typo -- or intention? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
But there's ARMs and ARMs... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Definitely too large span of ARM chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
many of the concepts in use with 8051 chips are applicable | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the problem with 'embedded' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's the small side that is i need of a forum | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Architecture Agnostic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I suppose you're right ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Metric to use depends on past experiences | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
apply the right parametres | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
once again, I have to agree | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
There's lot of analysis involved - about money | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, that's all true for the PC world ... but what about us? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Feature Creep | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Often easier to shrink after you have a product | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Absolutely! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Isn't that a product of poor analysis? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If requirements are properly analysed... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no, it is a result of 'poor' customers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Don't (necessarily) blame the customers! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no blame of the customer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's often like pulling teeth ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Consultant? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Managing expectations | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You can have "the talk" ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You are still just the machine shop with ready blue prints | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You can't engineer an enigma | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Still not admitting different development requirements | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
holydays time | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
See? Now here's a guy who knows how to solve the problem | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Still not seeing the picture | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not exactly ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I think you're confusing marketing with engineering | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
and neither have you | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I just haven't worked for FOOLS | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
RE: I haven't addressed your examples because | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, the world's going mad ... but I'm not on board | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Summing it up | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
free advice | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
too much ARM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Pardon?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Contract | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, it's true, but educating them should be their cost. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I have to disagree ... provisionally | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't see that as a problem ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No, they can't | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's true, but aren't most problems quite small? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Discussing Discussing ARMs on 8052.com ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, among others | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Then that's a completely different question! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
An observation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
correction | | 01/01/70 00:00 |