Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 11/26/10 12:29 Read: times	#179659 - for me is ok and interesting :-) Responding to: ???'s previous message

List of 80 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Discussing ARMs on 8052.com...?		01/01/70 00:00
Same same...		01/01/70 00:00
positive		01/01/70 00:00
SevensAndNines...		01/01/70 00:00
Sevens and Nines		01/01/70 00:00
Try the chat here then		01/01/70 00:00
I really want to discuss it here		01/01/70 00:00
for me is ok and interesting :-)		01/01/70 00:00
nevermind at least		01/01/70 00:00
OK		01/01/70 00:00
Scope of the forum		01/01/70 00:00
on other hand		01/01/70 00:00
I have to agree		01/01/70 00:00
Flaw in the argument		01/01/70 00:00
Fresh blood is needed		01/01/70 00:00
the closest thing to ...		01/01/70 00:00
But related to Keil tools		01/01/70 00:00
not really policed - yet...		01/01/70 00:00
Actually well policed and few to answer		01/01/70 00:00
"Policed"? [ed]		01/01/70 00:00
Not by Keil		01/01/70 00:00
Agreed.		01/01/70 00:00
what I said		01/01/70 00:00
That's what should happen here		01/01/70 00:00
Not a suitable platform		01/01/70 00:00
i vote aye		01/01/70 00:00
second the motion		01/01/70 00:00
a nice typo... or intention?		01/01/70 00:00
re: typo -- or intention?		01/01/70 00:00
But there's ARMs and ARMs...		01/01/70 00:00
Definitely too large span of ARM chips		01/01/70 00:00
many of the concepts in use with 8051 chips are applicable		01/01/70 00:00
the problem with 'embedded'		01/01/70 00:00
It's the small side that is i need of a forum		01/01/70 00:00
Architecture Agnostic		01/01/70 00:00
I suppose you're right ...		01/01/70 00:00
Metric to use depends on past experiences		01/01/70 00:00
apply the right parametres		01/01/70 00:00
once again, I have to agree		01/01/70 00:00
There's lot of analysis involved - about money		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, that's all true for the PC world ... but what about us?		01/01/70 00:00
Feature Creep		01/01/70 00:00
Often easier to shrink after you have a product		01/01/70 00:00
Absolutely!		01/01/70 00:00
Isn't that a product of poor analysis?		01/01/70 00:00
If requirements are properly analysed...		01/01/70 00:00
no, it is a result of 'poor' customers		01/01/70 00:00
Don't (necessarily) blame the customers!		01/01/70 00:00
no blame of the customer		01/01/70 00:00
It's often like pulling teeth ...		01/01/70 00:00
Consultant?		01/01/70 00:00
Managing expectations		01/01/70 00:00
You can have "the talk" ...		01/01/70 00:00
You are still just the machine shop with ready blue prints		01/01/70 00:00
You can't engineer an enigma		01/01/70 00:00
Still not admitting different development requirements		01/01/70 00:00
holydays time		01/01/70 00:00
See? Now here's a guy who knows how to solve the problem		01/01/70 00:00
Still not seeing the picture		01/01/70 00:00
Not exactly ...		01/01/70 00:00
I think you're confusing marketing with engineering		01/01/70 00:00
and neither have you		01/01/70 00:00
I just haven't worked for FOOLS		01/01/70 00:00
RE: I haven't addressed your examples because		01/01/70 00:00
Well, the world's going mad ... but I'm not on board		01/01/70 00:00
Summing it up		01/01/70 00:00
free advice		01/01/70 00:00
too much ARM		01/01/70 00:00
Pardon??		01/01/70 00:00
Contract		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, it's true, but educating them should be their cost.		01/01/70 00:00
I have to disagree ... provisionally		01/01/70 00:00
I don't see that as a problem ...		01/01/70 00:00
No, they can't		01/01/70 00:00
That's true, but aren't most problems quite small?		01/01/70 00:00
Discussing Discussing ARMs on 8052.com ...		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, among others		01/01/70 00:00
Then that's a completely different question!		01/01/70 00:00
An observation		01/01/70 00:00
correction		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List