| So What Is An 8051/2 Good For? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| thoughts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The Future of the 805x | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| PARC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Bigger Hammers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re: Bigger Hammers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The opposite problem seems more common here! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Would Toyota have had the problem if ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Toyota: Case in point | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: Toyota | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It was a mechanical fix ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Parallel Processing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sometimes the practical reality is of little consequence | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Totally Agree, but I was looking for a magic bullet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: "outperform" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There are some operations ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| rephrased | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Now, you are extrapolating | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| good points, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How many 8051 chips uses 0.13u? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not yet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not exactly ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Do not get focused on one operation... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| any 8-bit instruction can exist in a 32-bit processor | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, but does it? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So have you looked at any other processors? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not a point of disagreement, but you missed it anyway | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A good point | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| beg to differ | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Disagree entirely! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, auto-increment/decrement is standard and not "feature" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What I wanted to point out ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Same same all the time. no "one size fits". | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and the most important point is (drumroll) .... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Comparing Apples to Oranges | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Prices are comparable | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Parallel processing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sweeping generalisation! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not a magic silver bullit | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Fond memories | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A magic bullet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Most concepts already exists in the wild | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Another generalisation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Speed vs latency | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why 8051? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Isn't it obvious? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ARM simpler than 8051 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Generalisation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ARM 'MCUs' have their limitations too! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You normally engineer with a backup plan | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No, it's not! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Im just trying to provide an argument | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| x bits are just one parameter among many | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Avoiding the issue | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Avoiding what issue? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| They say it because it's true! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: ARM is not the only 32-bitter | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Please don'g generalize | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Heterogenous multiprocessing widespread | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Re: Multicore 8051 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ALU chaining | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well... maybe | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A Linear Accelerator? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Its one of these | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| please, repeat | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| All I was saying was | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So what the '51 are good for... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not terribly helpful | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Always up to the developers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: The manufacturers tells us... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sales - "may be used for" presented as "recommended" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| pretty hot, low-power and small | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Automotive... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| but answers your original question (at least the one... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| MCS51 still rocking !!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Scale | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Missing the point | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Impossible to generalize into fields | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| An appropriate generalisation... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You are right..Andy Neil | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Cheers! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No..only AT89C52 can be used | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| why do you insist on Atmel? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what a strange post | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Tools? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Multiple manufactuers with (almost) identical chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Getting better | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Unified interrupt controller is really great | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, even with free tools for PIC/AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I mean no offense, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Similar difficulties coming to 8051/2? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Same same | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Is it your purchase price or why so sure AVR or PIC are off? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Answer to Per and Erik... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Living in the past | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Thanks John D. Maniraj | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| locking | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RE: Locking | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Agreed, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| fairly easy | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Don't forget consumer devices | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A perfect application | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 8051 vs ARM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| just thought of one case | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
