| ??? 06/02/10 13:33 Read: times |
#176354 - You really should have specified the whole task Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Chico Magalhães said:
I should told you before it was a assembly with the DS18B20, and not just the IC... ok...
But I think it is miss of the point all other type of questions and discussions. I dont want a free consultancy... as you put a product or a job in a classifieds is just what I wanted to do... "IF someone have a code AND want to share/give..." Nothing more. 40 messages in the topic! WOW! For a simple code! (Imagine if it was a code for an atomic bomb project!) If it were so simple, wouldn't you have done it yourself by now? Here we say: Tempestade em copo de água...
which is something like "A storm in a cup" (all water from the storm going inside a glass cup) This entire waste of bandwidth could have been avoided, Chico, if you had clearly and completely stated, at the outset, what your goal was. Now, I agree that you should always verify the complete functionality of your incoming components. I once asked this forum whether there was an already existing piece of software that would verify that a given 805x MCU was "healthy", and was met with "Why would you want to do that?" I had in my hand, at that time, a batch of perhaps two dozen 805x's that I'd purchased a long time earlier from a major distributor, yet suspected they were defective. I've been shipped rejects from time to time, and just wanted to figure out whether these were, in fact, rejects which should have been discarded. The fact is, if you purchase quantities small enough to be supplied by a distributor or other retailer, aside from the manufacturer himself, you're a fool not to check your incoming supplies. Your real issue in this matter is to figure out how to verify that your assembly works properly, however, and not just to check the sensor. RE |
