Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/31/12 13:08
Read: times


 
#186950 - Interesting
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
I pointed out that Atmel is well-known as having three architectures, so why are they only supporting two in their Studio - and making such a big thing about it?!

I would have thought it a quite cheap investment to handle 8051 chips. It's a small 8-bit core with a minimum of instructions so the simulation functionality would be correspondingly simple. It is way harder to simulate a processor with a pipeline with interleaved instructions together with pipeline stalls etc. And most of the peripherials would also be very easy to simulate.

It is most definitely the ARM chips that requires lots of work to support - even more to support well.

I did implement a simulator for the majority of the Mega-88 (did not have use for all peripherial functionality), spending about two weekends. Having a IDE infrastructure that supports two architectures should mean it would be simple to get that infrastructure to have dialog boxes etc for more architectures (unless someone did something horrifyingly wrong).


List of 84 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
P89V51Rx2 and P89LPC97x/P89LPC98x discontinued            01/01/70 00:00      
   Obsolete            01/01/70 00:00      
      in my opinion, a better idea            01/01/70 00:00      
         Attitude towards customers...            01/01/70 00:00      
            the story again, since Kai forgot            01/01/70 00:00      
               This is indeed a very very sad story...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, but it's a story similar to the one I told ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The problem is...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the problem is different            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's true and correct, BUT ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           So I did!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              my take            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 But...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    sure I cam            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Look to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I will, when ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       This wasn't a single person ... it was a whole team            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I guess 2 or 3 idiots...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I spoke with more than that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I also think few people where to blame            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Possibly, however ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Your only memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         No ... but it's the only ATMEL project I've been in.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         re repeats            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Not exactly ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Why not?            01/01/70 00:00      
               In US or Denmark?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  maybe, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                  $10E7 would not be enough            01/01/70 00:00      
            Guess what! ... I don't use NXP either.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Silicon Labs            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
               Tekmos            01/01/70 00:00      
                  IDE choice            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: IDE            01/01/70 00:00      
            re switching to SILabs            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: Silicon Labs            01/01/70 00:00      
               I have seeen very few EOLs f...            01/01/70 00:00      
         "SILabs are not making ARMs" - No Longer True!            01/01/70 00:00      
      I wouldn't rely on Atmel for 8051s...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Atmel AT89LP51ID2 is a rew release            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Interesting            01/01/70 00:00      
                  They can't even do one well!            01/01/70 00:00      
               AT89LP Developer Studio            01/01/70 00:00      
                  AT89LP Studio is a joke            01/01/70 00:00      
                     if you want cutting edge            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Depends on features            01/01/70 00:00      
                           if 128k code is not enough,            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Microchip/SST PC Firmware - found it!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 More            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 8051 Microchip press release            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Interesting.. GCC for the 8051?!            01/01/70 00:00      
   P89xV51xD2 replacement?            01/01/70 00:00      
      C8051F020 - A new chip in town..(kinda)            01/01/70 00:00      
         a thing I do when developing with the 12x/13x            01/01/70 00:00      
            I do similar for GPIO on "normal" processors            01/01/70 00:00      
               SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Silabs debug in Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                        why?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Keil vs SiLabs            01/01/70 00:00      
                              SiLabs vs anyone            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    there is a window for that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       SiLabs IDE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          please stop hijacking this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             hijack, maybe            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          if I recall            01/01/70 00:00      
         C8051F020 is old, better is C8015F58x            01/01/70 00:00      
            then look out            01/01/70 00:00      
      SST89E516R as P89V51 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
         SST89 bootloader            01/01/70 00:00      
            Microchip, obviously, wanted ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               quite obviously :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         SST89E516R as P89V51 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
            Bootloader for SST MCUs            01/01/70 00:00      
               SST Bootloader and Windows 7            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SST 89E516RD2 bootloader, EasyISP            01/01/70 00:00      
                     EasyIAP            01/01/70 00:00      
                        why in 2 steps?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           One step to 7            01/01/70 00:00      
   Nuvoton now have a replacement list            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List