Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/26/12 16:33
Read: times


 
#185693 - I also think few people where to blame
Responding to: ???'s previous message
No, probably not any son-in-law. Don't think it's common for larger companies.

It's just that some people have the wrong ideas about how you guard the company reputation.

Some people think you do it by never showing any errors - which then means you can't admit to errors when a customer already have the proof.

Some people instead realizes that customer relations is to admit to goofs and try to figure out a working solution that works for both parts.

So I too would guess at 1-3 persons. Either one person who pointed with whole hand ordering the reset what to say/do. Or a group of maybe 3 people who might even be totally lost. Just not know anything about the reality and just trying to follow the "corporate policy" in their own twisted way.

And with brick walls between departments in the organisation, no other bosses got to know about these stupidities. And the employees below did hot have access routes to forward their view on the situation to someone above/beside their own department head. So they had to prioritize between staying silent or cleaning out their desk and leave.

List of 84 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
P89V51Rx2 and P89LPC97x/P89LPC98x discontinued            01/01/70 00:00      
   Obsolete            01/01/70 00:00      
      in my opinion, a better idea            01/01/70 00:00      
         Attitude towards customers...            01/01/70 00:00      
            the story again, since Kai forgot            01/01/70 00:00      
               This is indeed a very very sad story...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, but it's a story similar to the one I told ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The problem is...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        the problem is different            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's true and correct, BUT ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           So I did!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              my take            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 But...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    sure I cam            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Look to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I will, when ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       This wasn't a single person ... it was a whole team            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I guess 2 or 3 idiots...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I spoke with more than that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I also think few people where to blame            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Possibly, however ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Your only memory?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         No ... but it's the only ATMEL project I've been in.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         re repeats            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Not exactly ... but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Why not?            01/01/70 00:00      
               In US or Denmark?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  maybe, but            01/01/70 00:00      
                  $10E7 would not be enough            01/01/70 00:00      
            Guess what! ... I don't use NXP either.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Silicon Labs            01/01/70 00:00      
            P89C668 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
               Tekmos            01/01/70 00:00      
                  IDE choice            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: IDE            01/01/70 00:00      
            re switching to SILabs            01/01/70 00:00      
            re: Silicon Labs            01/01/70 00:00      
               I have seeen very few EOLs f...            01/01/70 00:00      
         "SILabs are not making ARMs" - No Longer True!            01/01/70 00:00      
      I wouldn't rely on Atmel for 8051s...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Atmel AT89LP51ID2 is a rew release            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Interesting            01/01/70 00:00      
                  They can't even do one well!            01/01/70 00:00      
               AT89LP Developer Studio            01/01/70 00:00      
                  AT89LP Studio is a joke            01/01/70 00:00      
                     if you want cutting edge            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Depends on features            01/01/70 00:00      
                           if 128k code is not enough,            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Microchip/SST PC Firmware - found it!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 More            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 8051 Microchip press release            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Interesting.. GCC for the 8051?!            01/01/70 00:00      
   P89xV51xD2 replacement?            01/01/70 00:00      
      C8051F020 - A new chip in town..(kinda)            01/01/70 00:00      
         a thing I do when developing with the 12x/13x            01/01/70 00:00      
            I do similar for GPIO on "normal" processors            01/01/70 00:00      
               SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Silabs debug in Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                        why?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Keil vs SiLabs            01/01/70 00:00      
                              SiLabs vs anyone            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    there is a window for that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    SiLabs IDE and Keil uVision 3.0            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       SiLabs IDE            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          please stop hijacking this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             hijack, maybe            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          if I recall            01/01/70 00:00      
         C8051F020 is old, better is C8015F58x            01/01/70 00:00      
            then look out            01/01/70 00:00      
      SST89E516R as P89V51 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
         SST89 bootloader            01/01/70 00:00      
            Microchip, obviously, wanted ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               quite obviously :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         SST89E516R as P89V51 replacement            01/01/70 00:00      
            Bootloader for SST MCUs            01/01/70 00:00      
               SST Bootloader and Windows 7            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SST 89E516RD2 bootloader, EasyISP            01/01/70 00:00      
                     EasyIAP            01/01/70 00:00      
                        why in 2 steps?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           One step to 7            01/01/70 00:00      
   Nuvoton now have a replacement list            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List