??? 02/18/11 16:55 Read: times |
#181184 - I'm not so certain of that ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
The Silabs, which you use, are top flight but they have two problems, (1) they are only available in smd and (2)they are very expensive. Yep they are great chips, years ahead of their time, but the above latter facts remain.
"they are only available in smd" is something everybody will have to learn to live with "they are very expensive" I also love the LPC9xx chips, but as a reply to "AVR is the greatest, fastest, most wonderful" I chose to mention SILabs. Erik With the high speeds and fast edges, we can't tolerate the effects of long leads or even large lead frames as we did when clocks were at about 10 or 12 MHz. Further, the greater use of totally synchronous logic requires that more emphasis be put on short distance between power pins and supply bypass members. Keeping 'em a mm or so is not unreasonable. Having a 20 mm lead frame doesn't help anything in that regard. As much as I like working with the generously spaced leads on the old-style DIL packages, Even I have learned to use PLCC's for wire-wrap and whatever adapters are suitable for other packages, e.g. TQFP. However, it's no secret that few applications really require those ultra-fast MCU's. If a 12 MHz 12-clocker will do the job, there's little, though some, advantage in using a slower one-clocker, though it does save power. RE RE |