Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/11 16:55
Read: times


 
#181184 - I'm not so certain of that ...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
The Silabs, which you use, are top flight but they have two problems, (1) they are only available in smd and (2)they are very expensive. Yep they are great chips, years ahead of their time, but the above latter facts remain.
"they are only available in smd" is something everybody will have to learn to live with
"they are very expensive" I also love the LPC9xx chips, but as a reply to "AVR is the greatest, fastest, most wonderful" I chose to mention SILabs.

Erik


With the high speeds and fast edges, we can't tolerate the effects of long leads or even large lead frames as we did when clocks were at about 10 or 12 MHz. Further, the greater use of totally synchronous logic requires that more emphasis be put on short distance between power pins and supply bypass members. Keeping 'em a mm or so is not unreasonable. Having a 20 mm lead frame doesn't help anything in that regard. As much as I like working with the generously spaced leads on the old-style DIL packages, Even I have learned to use PLCC's for wire-wrap and whatever adapters are suitable for other packages, e.g. TQFP.

However, it's no secret that few applications really require those ultra-fast MCU's. If a 12 MHz 12-clocker will do the job, there's little, though some, advantage in using a slower one-clocker, though it does save power.

RE


RE






List of 84 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
upcoming AT89LP chips            01/01/70 00:00      
   Interesting..            01/01/70 00:00      
      MCS-251            01/01/70 00:00      
   I wouldn't hold my breath ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why bother waiting?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Says who?            01/01/70 00:00      
         says me!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Doing oneself a favour?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Tie-ins            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes,but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Who else manufactures '51 in PDIL40 at low cost?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Nobody can beat STC in the field of low cost 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nice link            01/01/70 00:00      
                           yes so fast            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nice stuff in PDIL 40 aswell eh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Low cost DIP's..            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Who uses DIPs?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The hobbyist connection..            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Things to like            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Free Tools..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Re: ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Intel            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Never did            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             it wasn't always like that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                actively promoting the core?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   things were different then ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       define "abandoned"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Managers            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Re: Intel            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             actually, Intel *used to make* ARMs...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I know..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Loved the efficient 68k emulation in newer Palms            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Re: 68K virtualisation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Abandoned            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             intel museum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                 request historical documents            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   what link?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      here            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   wayback machine            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      unfortunately not - in this case            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         ftp://download.intel.com/            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      I've found it increasingly rare ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   museum            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re: the hobbyist connection            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Re: the hobbyist connection            01/01/70 00:00      
                              My experience            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Multitude of packages            01/01/70 00:00      
                           In that case..            01/01/70 00:00      
                           AVR - only limited DIP availability.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Limited needs for full set of DIL chips            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Unfortunately, there are stumbling blocks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           "Breadboards" ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes I do,            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Lovely example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 A thing of beauty, eh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    What's crazy is that many of these seem to work            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Check long-term availability of any DIP variants            01/01/70 00:00      
                        DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                           And your point is...?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I'm not convinced that's real reason ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Prototyping methods            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    You can say that again!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You have a point, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Have you counted the oscillator?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Look at the package pin-count.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Pin counts            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Haven't seen skinny 40-pin DIL            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I've got to agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       high pin-count DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I'm not sure what the constraints were, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Oops. I meant 0.6" DIL            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Shrink DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I remember,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Yes, it was 0.9 inches as was that 68000            01/01/70 00:00      
            maybe not, but            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yep,but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Is it 1998 already?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  something everybody will have to learn to live with            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I'm not so certain of that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        also disappearing            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Well, once again, I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: AVR/xmega            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List