Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/18/11 09:10
Read: times


 
#181177 - Not really
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I did a lot of work with 4-10MHz equipment quite a number of years ago, and it did work well. A number of them required external RAM and external EPROM, consuming lots of power and making lots of external signals jump synchronously.

It should still be possible to use solderless breadboards now - people have a choice to decide how high-impedance they want their signals. And lots of microcontrollers have internal RC oscillator good enough for normal UART use, removing a lot of needs for an external crystal.

Professional developers always looks down on people playing with these solderless breadboards. In reality, quite a lot of engineers got their initial training using them.

It is obviously a lot better to use soldered prototypes. And since I can afford it, I don't need to think about component reuse. But that is not the situation for many beginners. Especially since their initial designs may change a lot because of trial-and-error designs.

An important issue is that beginners have just as big reasons to play with blinking LEDs now as they had 15 years ago. Not everything are designs that runs the ADC at 100kHz or runs 5Mbps SPI links or processes 10ns pulses. That solderless breadboard do teach people why debouncing is needed the hard way. A skill that is valuable to have.

Of course, beginners today have the advantage that they don't need to start with raw chips. They can get cheap development kits and just use their breadboards for I/O designs. But remember that without a digital scope, lots of people starts with projects where the signal speeds aren't higher that they look at signals with a LED or a DMM. And where the speed difference between bounces and real signals are so huge that it's very easy to debounce the signals.



List of 84 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
upcoming AT89LP chips            01/01/70 00:00      
   Interesting..            01/01/70 00:00      
      MCS-251            01/01/70 00:00      
   I wouldn't hold my breath ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why bother waiting?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Says who?            01/01/70 00:00      
         says me!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Doing oneself a favour?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Tie-ins            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes,but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Who else manufactures '51 in PDIL40 at low cost?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Nobody can beat STC in the field of low cost 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nice link            01/01/70 00:00      
                           yes so fast            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nice stuff in PDIL 40 aswell eh!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Low cost DIP's..            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Who uses DIPs?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The hobbyist connection..            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Things to like            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Free Tools..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Re: ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Intel            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Never did            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             it wasn't always like that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                actively promoting the core?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   things were different then ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       define "abandoned"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Managers            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Re: Intel            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             actually, Intel *used to make* ARMs...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                I know..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Loved the efficient 68k emulation in newer Palms            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Re: 68K virtualisation            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Abandoned            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             intel museum            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                 request historical documents            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   what link?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      here            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   wayback machine            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      unfortunately not - in this case            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         ftp://download.intel.com/            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      I've found it increasingly rare ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   museum            01/01/70 00:00      
                           re: the hobbyist connection            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Re: the hobbyist connection            01/01/70 00:00      
                              My experience            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Multitude of packages            01/01/70 00:00      
                           In that case..            01/01/70 00:00      
                           AVR - only limited DIP availability.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Limited needs for full set of DIL chips            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Unfortunately, there are stumbling blocks            01/01/70 00:00      
                           "Breadboards" ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes I do,            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Lovely example!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 A thing of beauty, eh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    What's crazy is that many of these seem to work            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: Check long-term availability of any DIP variants            01/01/70 00:00      
                        DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                           And your point is...?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I'm not convinced that's real reason ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Prototyping methods            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    You can say that again!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Not really            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You have a point, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Have you counted the oscillator?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Look at the package pin-count.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Pin counts            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Haven't seen skinny 40-pin DIL            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I've got to agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       high pin-count DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I'm not sure what the constraints were, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Oops. I meant 0.6" DIL            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Shrink DIP            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I remember,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Yes, it was 0.9 inches as was that 68000            01/01/70 00:00      
            maybe not, but            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yep,but...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Is it 1998 already?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  something everybody will have to learn to live with            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I'm not so certain of that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        also disappearing            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Well, once again, I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Re: AVR/xmega            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List