??? 09/23/10 23:48 Read: times |
#178677 - But it does matter Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
I refer to the 'F12x because that's the one I have in my desk drawer, but you're certainly right. I don't see the advantage of using USB, as async serial, though slower, would work just as well. There's no reason not to use USB, of course.
... I was thinking about the 'F120 because it can be operated at 100 MIPS, and therefore perhaps do the translation on-the-fly. With that board DLP device that Michael recommended, perhaps it could all be done within the PC. My thought was that, in reality, any MCU that has an adequate, and adequately fast, ADC would work, once the data transfer to the PC was provided in some form. Of course, the sample depth has to be very large, since the time interval over which the desired observation, namely the rise and fall of Vcc could be observed. With as much capacitance as some people put on their boards, it could take minutes ... many minutes ... to decay to a point at which the MCU and other circuits actually stop operating. You said yourself that the price should be low. The F12x is more than twice that of the F34x. And the F12x DevKit is even almost 4x more expensive than an F34x ToolStick with Base Adapter. The advantage of USB is that you can stream the samples straight to the PC. No need for a large sample depth and no need for processing power. And the F34x running at 48MHz is only half as fast as the F12x. Yet the ADC can sample twice as fast on the F34x. |