strange behaviour in serial communication | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Slow VCC Decay | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Get rid of the crappy R/C reset circuit | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
try this experiment... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
totally irrelevant | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
thanks all | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if you are running 5V .... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I agree | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What's irrelevant is.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not irrelevant to evaluate before buying | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if this refer to my post .... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am glad i started such a healthy discussion :) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not start but restrart | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Will be more threads | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
to Gary Peek | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I doubt that will help | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
bad news | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
time to show ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Oh My Gosh | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I do not know to which extent ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
A number of short forms are commonly accepted in formal text | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
we are getting distracted here | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What I would like to outlaw | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SMS? I think not. Just in a hurry to prove... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
here is the code again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
that code could not possibly produce | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
but it is ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
here are the screenshots from hyperterminal | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Still Seems Like... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Could Also Be | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
By the way... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
good advice and an addendum | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
supervisor decoupling | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
But things are quite slow! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
yes cutting of DC fixed the issue | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Are you sure? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Oh no it hasn't! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
ok I agree , lets discuss | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It depends on what your goals are | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
"DNA scope" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The Thing Is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Frequent examples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Scope time! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Would this sort of thing be at all helpful? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Quite possibly | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I suspect they're all AC-coupled | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
AC Coupled -- No Good | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
More than DC power decay... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Isn't there some way of conditioning the input? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No DC Bandwidth | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No argument there ... but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Do you really think... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Certainly, you're right ... however ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Squeezing DC through AC Channel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
and, for all practical purposes ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
How about this ... ??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Invert and add to subract the AC?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What about using other sampling hardware? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
making a scope (sampling or not) is fairly simple | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
true enough ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
USB modems really nifty | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Maybe the USB 'scopes are nifty ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
USB 'scopes' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
for observing PSU behavior ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
making a scope (sampling or not) is fairly simple | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Well, I haven't tried it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
another approach | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Using hardware as built ... as much as possible | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
SiLabs C8051F34x | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Which MCU is used doesn't matter ... yet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
But it does matter | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I agree, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
100MHz++ is nice but lots of areas are below 100kHz | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
While that works for some ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Different tools good at different times | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
no argument from me | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
For one so insistent on answering the question as asked... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
This should have been a new thread, eh? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
too new, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
For crude display ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |