??? 08/03/10 03:09 Read: times Msg Score: -1 -1 Message Not Useful |
#177579 - If only that were relevant Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
That NMIY-0031 is next to rubbish for learning about state of the art technologies. It's not about learning about technologies ... it's about learning about one specific technology, namely the 805x core. Further, the SiLabs part offers no assembler support, and that is the language the O/P wanted to use. I'm sorry to be critical but if I was looking to hire a developer and two people showed up that had MCU development skills I would select the person that demonstrated knowledge skills and clever applications for one of the latest MCUs of the types like the SiLabs parts or highly integrated NXP parts. If somebody else showed up with skills derived from 25 year old technology I'd have to think a while and ask a lot of questions before bringing them onto the team as opposed to the first described person.
Engineers, especially the less experienced ones tend to design products using the components and techniques that they have learned with or have used before. If someone came to me and proposed to design a product for me centered around a glob of old fashioned crap that looked like this this: I'd tell them to go take a hike. It is 2010 for gosh sakes. Not 1991. Michael Karas It's clearly old technology, but if I had a guy come to me knowing how to squeeze useful work from this board, as opposed to the highly non-standard SiLabs part, I'd not be so hasty. It is 2010, but there's been mostly "retrograde advance" made over the past decade and a half. Now there are few parts from multiple vendors, so entire hardware/firmware has to be respun just because one vendor decides to hike his price. The guy who knows the core can substitute nearly any other MCU he likes. The guy relying on and knowing nothing but SiLabs would have a harder time. RE |