Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 08/11/09 15:08 Read: times	#168317 - I'm going to recommend Responding to: ???'s previous message
	using the UARTs.

List of 71 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Communication between two 8051		01/01/70 00:00
I'm going to recommend		01/01/70 00:00
I'm going to recommend		01/01/70 00:00
I'd recommend ...		01/01/70 00:00
irrelevant, however		01/01/70 00:00
chip		01/01/70 00:00
multiple chips ....		01/01/70 00:00
Perhaps you don't need two UARTs		01/01/70 00:00
Side note, multiple COM ports		01/01/70 00:00
FTDI Multi-UART to USB		01/01/70 00:00
Clarify?		01/01/70 00:00
Parallel 8051 TXs and RXs		01/01/70 00:00
Two transmitters		01/01/70 00:00
Which lesson to give?		01/01/70 00:00
and ..		01/01/70 00:00
Like good little children		01/01/70 00:00
Jimmy Neutron/Phineas & Ferb		01/01/70 00:00
Tony Gelonese's method should work...		01/01/70 00:00
no, and yes		01/01/70 00:00
some more thought...Per Westermark		01/01/70 00:00
It is all in the subpressed details		01/01/70 00:00
SIlabs chips would burn		01/01/70 00:00
No, That won't "just work"		01/01/70 00:00
I think there's more to this than meets the eye		01/01/70 00:00
Not always interrupt response instantly		01/01/70 00:00
Since the O/P hasn't been back ...		01/01/70 00:00
serial communication		01/01/70 00:00
you are aware?		01/01/70 00:00
You are also aware?		01/01/70 00:00
Synchronize transfers		01/01/70 00:00
Connecting two TX outputs		01/01/70 00:00
Unnecessary complication!		01/01/70 00:00
Different name		01/01/70 00:00
Walter and Walter		01/01/70 00:00
Name		01/01/70 00:00
what are you ashamed/afraid/... of		01/01/70 00:00
Walter, Please eschew obfuscation and equivocation		01/01/70 00:00
That Phytec Board has RS485 and I2C and SPI		01/01/70 00:00
summarizing		01/01/70 00:00
to a nail everything looks like a hammer		01/01/70 00:00
actually ... he hasn't said he needs that ...		01/01/70 00:00
Often important information arrives quite late		01/01/70 00:00
Actually, he did!		01/01/70 00:00
It's not complete		01/01/70 00:00
he's so stingy with information		01/01/70 00:00
Some more Thought....		01/01/70 00:00
This assumes perfect synchronization		01/01/70 00:00
the longest reply ever		01/01/70 00:00
Schematic is Incomplete		01/01/70 00:00
Missing boundary limits		01/01/70 00:00
Use p3.0 and p3.1		01/01/70 00:00
huh?		01/01/70 00:00
You need to clarify your requirement!		01/01/70 00:00
This contradicts an earlier post from you		01/01/70 00:00
agree with most, but???		01/01/70 00:00
clock-for-clock send		01/01/70 00:00
Still not clear!		01/01/70 00:00
I think you lost the thread		01/01/70 00:00
If they're to remain in precise synchronization ...		01/01/70 00:00
Ridiculous		01/01/70 00:00
Come on, Walter!		01/01/70 00:00
It's routinely done ...		01/01/70 00:00
Don't relive your past again and again		01/01/70 00:00
MCU is a component, not a computer system.		01/01/70 00:00
Tell me more about femtosecond precision		01/01/70 00:00
not even then		01/01/70 00:00
Watch out		01/01/70 00:00
Some suggestions for low-jitter processor activation		01/01/70 00:00
That's exactly what it is		01/01/70 00:00
The two slaves must be in the same state		01/01/70 00:00
Is this yet another problem?		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List