| has linux had its chips? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| some weirdo in sandals a ponytail | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Problem is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| possibly, but not only | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's all in the history ... and "read the code" doesn't work | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Good points! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why not a firm objective? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Lots of projects have a large percentage research | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I knew you'd have to come in with something irrelevant | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Try document an invention before it's invented... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Here's some research for you, Per | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Richard to give an example | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'd like YOU, Erik, to come up with one example ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Always prejudice from Richard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 'documenting' means many things | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| here we go again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| when you're wrong, you're wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I do not have a microscope and probes that small | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So you've made no observations ... you just guessed ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and that irks you immensely | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What did you do, aside from guessing? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| then please, tell me | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Are you willing to explore this in detail? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| now you are jumping | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Your references aren't exactly backing your view | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's not about me ... it's about process | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But processes contains feedback loops | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I believe you've gone off-the-rails, Per | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But getty isn't Linux | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's a small piece, but it's an example | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But not of Linux | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It was part of the distribution. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 'Research' can mean many things | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, but that's in a different context | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You still haven't told what Linux documentation you miss | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't know what you mean | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Still claims based on assumptions and not facts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not everyone is completely stupid | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But what is the relevance today? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I've no opinion about the current LINUX | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and, you Richard, who loves living in the past | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| just a minute, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Examples? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nothing has changed since 15 years ago ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| at least not Richards opinions :) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Still lots of assumptions and unbacked claims | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Oh, Richard, I have a job for you | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I had Yourdons first book as manuscript and ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| be careful ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| were you once a bartender ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You have to accept the difference ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| We are careful | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Hog Wash..... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Odd that you see it that way ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I just documented fully | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Because an "Objective" is not a final product specification | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I have to disagree ... the objective specification is step 1 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| documentation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Definitely not the "usual response" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Android | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't think so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Don't agree | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| all due respect, no. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Apple may have a price match on the superluxourious | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re: Apple may have a price match on the superluxourious | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| but 95% of the population does not need.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Web browsing normally the most power-hungry you can do | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re: 95% | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| So how exactly am I wrong? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But Android is Linux | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just the opposite | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| {sigh} | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| just like the preacher said to the atheist | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re: How exactly? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 850000 Android phones activated per day, linux video | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| anecdotes... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| These guys... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| digital audio consoles | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The Rasperry Pi Foundation clearly doesn't think so! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The world isn't just a few companies | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the basic problem with free software is... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Careful with the use of "Linux". Most things "Linux" aren't! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I did refer to linux itself | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Wrong hw selected, or just big lack of platform knowledge? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| a port | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Always danger with low-level code for platform | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| True - but "paid-for" is not necessarily any better! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| when selecting any tool | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| As Stallman said..... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| free | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| All about volume or already existing knowledge/experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well...say what you like about me, and many people do. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
