??? 11/11/09 00:05 Read: times |
#170665 - I don't see it as overly complex. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
For that I'd use one, two, or three LED's with a diffuser for each word, depending on word length, rather than a multiple of LED's for each character.
overly complex, you would need multiple sizes of diffusers, regulating the intensity for a 3 letter word to be the same as the intensity for a 5 letter word (while maintaining the color temperature) Maybe, but what would change the color temperature? The diffuser is cut to size with a scissor and the light lens with a saw. The LED's are inserted into holes drilled with a water-cooled drill, which renders the plastic lens quite transparent. The brightness is controlled with modulation, as you've often suggested. With so few words, each one can be modulated separately. Aside from increasing the effort and cost considerably, I don't see how multiple LED's per character help anything.
multiple LED's per character (e.g. 2*2) was mentioned as a possible solution for larger/brighter characters. Yes, it would offer that option, but it would require a MUCH larger panel. Erik With the addition of what I'd call a colander or net layer between the LED matrix and the panel containing the required words, I think Per's approach could be nearly affordable. My only reservation lies in including all the necessary words on that small a matrix. I rather doubt that 16 lines of 16 characters would be adequate. RE |