??? 11/07/09 17:01 Read: times |
#170534 - That looks like the most straightforward way to do it! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per Westermark said:
It is my belief that the copy firm is using an optical/chemical process. The film I receive doesn't have the black color on the outside of the plastic, like you get with a laser printer. The color seems to be inside the surface of the sheet on one side. It is almost impossible to scratch the plastic to remove the color. And the black is really, really black. Works perfect together with an UW lamp when making PCB. It seems to be a cold process, so I have never seen any problem with registration caused by the plastic changing size. The film is maybe twice as thick as the OH sheets you use in a laser printer, and they are perfectly flat and smooth with shiny surfaces on both sides. For optimum results when making dual-sided boards, one side of the layout should be printed mirrored on the plastic, allowing the side of the sheet with the print towards the PCB.
The clock has the characters placed in a fixed-grid matrix, so it should be possible to use 1x1 or 2x2 or 3x3 backlight diodes for each character position. An advanced student could even select two-color LED matrix modules. And the lack of movement removes one of the challenges since the control of the diodes will not be time-critical. I think a diffuser, similar to what photographers used to call an opal-glass, for each individual word/phrase to be treated as a single unit with an appropriate number of LED's to illuminate it sufficiently might be the solution of choice. The differences in illumination would have to be regulated with the number of LED's and the drive current/duty-cycle. Again, not quite as simple as it might be, but since this is a display comprised not of individual characters but of text strings, it has to be illuminated as such, doesn't it? The optical process might not be the cheapest method, either, though I agree it would probably be the highest-quality option. I think a laser-printed or inkjet-printed mask with two layers, one printed in mirror-image, and the ink/toner-sides placed together to minimize parallax would be the cheapest, though all bets are off as to how many attempts it would take to get it "just-so". RE |