Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/06/09 07:58
Modified:
  05/06/09 07:58

Read: times


 
#165096 - Architecture speed
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The two things are mixed in my optinion:

1. Architecture speed improvement - it doesn't depend on MHz. It is a feature which decides how fast certain architecture can run Dhrystone v2.1 (in this case) if we'd run both of them (compiled identically by the same C compiler) at the same CLK frequency. So in case of DT8051 vs 80C51 we have 8.1 and it does not depend on MHz. This factor is constant no matter if we apply 1 kHz or 12 MHz to both CPUs. Let me know if I'm wrong. This comparison make sense because both architectures execute identical 255 binary opcodes.

2. Maximum real CLK frequency - it is the real value applied to CLK pin of both architectures (DCD's DT8051 and Intel's 80C51). So assuming that Intel 80C51 can run 12 MHz, and DCD's DT8051 can run 200 MHz in Virtex-5 FPGA, we know that Dhrystone program executes 200MHz/12MHz= 16.67 times shorter because of different CLK, and additionally 8.1x shorter because of architecture speed. So final factor for Dt8051 is 135.0 times shorter than 80C51. But this is because of different CLK frequencies. In case when we'd apply 200 MHz to Intel 80C51 (of course theoretically) then we have again 8.1x factor for DT8051 vs 80C51. I hope it is clear and doesn't contain any stupid mistake.

Please correct me if I'm wrong in those two statements.

List of 74 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
max clk freq            01/01/70 00:00      
   Which            01/01/70 00:00      
   300MHz            01/01/70 00:00      
      .            01/01/70 00:00      
         Does that make it effectively 600MHz, then...?            01/01/70 00:00      
            That are the links I found...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Interesting item, but did you notice ... ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  300Mips, equivalent to 3.6GHz!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     That's slightly misleading ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        You sure about your math?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           It's confusing ... typical marketing drivel            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Based on the claims you posted            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Those aren't my claims!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Read comments _before_ (not) answering them            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Architecture speed            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          That was my take too            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Of course, it does not depend on CLK frequency!            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I cannot see a confusion            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Not all one-clocker mfg's make the same claims            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    But...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 comparison of 12- and less-clockers            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Very nice!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Cool!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Good overview            01/01/70 00:00      
               Another link            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Dhrystone?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Yes ... one could argue that the core is hobbled            01/01/70 00:00      
                        to sell IS useful... ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Dhrystone            01/01/70 00:00      
                        give data            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I find it useful...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Nonsense            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Nice attitude...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        One thing that would be useful for FPGA            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Still waiting            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Here it is ... It's simple arithmetic            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Not at all!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You missed the "at the same frequency" part            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    You're right, in a sense ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Still thinking of the DT8051 as 12-clocker            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Gee ... I can see where I went off the track!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             You deserve respect for that...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Very easy to miss things            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                It is a shame the documentation is so superficial            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Marketing demagogy            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                baloney            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Insignificant?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      the "classical" timing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Fair claim            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Not so fast, there, Pilgrim...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Any alternative?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Possibly ... ???            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Still pipelining            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            It doesn't have to pipeline            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               What use?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  if critical, lock - if you can            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     What question?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        Whatever happened to Amit Mittal ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           maximum speed of a car            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           Pigeon Poster?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        no question, uncernity            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  It's not that difficult ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                     Are we talking about the same thing?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                        It is a matter of how you choose to view things            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                           Q still open: any 8051 with only two clock transitions?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              I do not believe bigger is better ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 You argue quite much for not caring            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                    Without going into too much detail ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                       Pipeline for concurrency            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                          One step at a time            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                             Many steps at the same time            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                              1-clocker without pipelining            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                                 Interesting link - I just wish it was a bit meatier            01/01/70 00:00      
   what the datasheet for the particular device states            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List