Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/02/07 13:46
Read: times


 
#138471 - slowig down the bugger is not going to make it clo
Responding to: ???'s previous message
slowing down the bugger is not going to make it clock better on a clock risetime that is way out of specs So we still need to remove the input capacitor or use a schmitt trigger..

I see what you suggest and, in combination with removing the capacitor on the clock, is an interesting idea, abeit that it will not work.

The problem with your circuit (and no clock capacitor), is that if someone press the button, hold it for, say, 5 seconds, you will, on the release bounce, reverse the effect of the 'contact press'. So we are back with the capacitor on the input (and the schmitt trigger).

So, since the schmitt trigger solves the problem and is required in any case, why add 'your' components.

Anyhow, my compliments, for thinking of a 'theoritically better' solution.

Erik

List of 53 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Momentary toggle soft switch with flip-flop?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I don't like it.            01/01/70 00:00      
      How Bouncy            01/01/70 00:00      
         what good does 'minimum' do you            01/01/70 00:00      
   Schmidt trigger            01/01/70 00:00      
      Tricky...            01/01/70 00:00      
         rail to rail bounce            01/01/70 00:00      
      McKinney            01/01/70 00:00      
   4013 FF toggle circuit            01/01/70 00:00      
      Values?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Values of R1,R2 &R3? Look at PCB!            01/01/70 00:00      
            clocking a FF from an RC?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Agreed            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Follow the datsheet, that is design            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Why dismissing the flip-flop?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     dismissing the flip-flop?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The CD4013 of Bruce's schematic            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The CD4013 of Bruce's schematic is shown as a f/f            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I answered to Bruce...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The circuit shown,,,,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Power Consumption            01/01/70 00:00      
   Overlooking the obvious?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Simpler?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Keymat            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why not a hard switch?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Requirements            01/01/70 00:00      
      Industrial designers is why            01/01/70 00:00      
         Fair enough!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Let The Microconroller Decide            01/01/70 00:00      
      dedicated microcontroller :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
      Interresting no flip-flop            01/01/70 00:00      
   dat is de bounce            01/01/70 00:00      
   The 4013 needs steep edges            01/01/70 00:00      
      caps            01/01/70 00:00      
      A Vauge Suggestion            01/01/70 00:00      
   additional parts            01/01/70 00:00      
      what pin of which chip in what package?            01/01/70 00:00      
         chip on drawing in generic post            01/01/70 00:00      
            slowig down the bugger is not going to make it clo            01/01/70 00:00      
   What about this?            01/01/70 00:00      
      what is 'SOFTSW"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Seems OK Except...            01/01/70 00:00      
         nice to find a fellow "drawer of fuctions"            01/01/70 00:00      
            I find it eaasier to just...            01/01/70 00:00      
               We appreciate it            01/01/70 00:00      
      Further Analysis....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Would this work?            01/01/70 00:00      
      All comments noted            01/01/70 00:00      
   Round 3 - Hopefully better            01/01/70 00:00      
      Round 4 is the winner            01/01/70 00:00      
         Tomas?? Bruce?? Are you a schizo?            01/01/70 00:00      
            haha, yes            01/01/70 00:00      
         A bit confusing...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List