AT89LP51xD2 ... coming? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sounds brilliant! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Was it AVR who made low-quantity available? Or just spin-off | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Probably true | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Hobbyists and students are really important | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Also... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That wasn't the only thing ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Assembler | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
'LP simulator | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Good | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No ... I doubt he means that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That may have been the case, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
While that may be the case ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Never used C - planned to but had to settle for half memsize | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
See ... 'C' can make the memory requirement greater | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
But it ain't *necessarily* so | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, that's a valid basis for the choice of 'C' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Just don't kick in open doors | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Again, you may be totally correct about that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
sure, and so friggin what if ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well ... that's not exactly what I did ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
On chip debug | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Why unlikely? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's true. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yes, that's what I meant! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Missed the point! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Ah, sorry. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Single Clocker LP Chips From Atmel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Samples Not... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
they are good at that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Atmel says... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Samples Yes!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Nothing here yet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you are not in the US | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No excuse! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Envelope? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
... "coming" ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Yet another missed opportunity. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sorry thought this thread closed ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Now maybe you guys will see why I don't use 'em | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
hard to tell, but... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
They're thrashing about, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
why the sigh ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Probably not ... but you never know ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
datasheets | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'm glad they're there ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sad, but true. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Too much "designers" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's that old bugaboo ... appearance over substance ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'd say | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
"The part will only be available in about 3 weeks" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I've heard/read that comment from them before ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Common with delays for new chips | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Quite so! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I have to remind the public-at-risk | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
There's a purpose ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I agree with Per !! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not so, but it probably applies to every one of ATMEL's | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
samples | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I tested... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The AT89LP4052 works very well | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Looks good, so far, eh? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
A typical op | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
singleclockers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
impressive | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I will wait and see. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Transistors are cheap | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I can't find that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sorry. I thought it was unlikely. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
copy/paste | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
thanks | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Have you received those samples, Andy? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |