??? 10/31/11 02:34 Read: times |
#184467 - Keep the signal paths as simple as possible. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Zeeshan Ashraf said:
The other way, perhaps could be to use a sort of NTC / PTC in the signal path of the Load-cell somehow to compensate for temperature changes. This is not a good idea at all. Think about it for just a couple of seconds. Some sort of analogue temperature compensation circuits will add more areas of problems to the circuit that add to your error budget. I would not follow this path at all. Follow what Kai suggested to add a separate channels that read the temperature of the load cells directly and bring them back into the digital realm of the controller firmware. This eliminates the multitude of additional error points that some type analogue temp comp will introduce. I suspect that for the temperature readings of the load cells for this digital compensation that a couple of degrees accuracy is quite good. This may let you try to actually use one of the common digital temperature sensors that have a digital serial type interface. Michael Karas |