Did you actually read what I have posted several times in this thread?

I have explicitly noted that what you don't like about your selector is the sawtooth results you get for the individual color channels when you merge the states of the three color channels by doing r + N*g + N*N*b where N is the number of intensity levels for a single channel.

And I did explicitly tell you that you need to create an area-filling (or actually volume-filling since R + G + B forms three dimensions) walk through the RGB cube to get a combined index that does't result in any large jumps for any single color channel channel.

Have you still not bothered to read this post?
http://www.8052.com/forum/read/176589

How much help do you think you can expect if you completely refuses to read the answers you get. You seem to read the first 5 words and then decide that you know what the post is about. Then you respond with a random "That is not what I want" or "That is not relevant" or "You have not understood".

We not only have understood but are five steps in front of you.

But the big issue we have not understood is why you think that it would be a good idea to have a table that walks all 125 color combinations while minimizing the color changes for any one color channel. It is so much simpler to just walk the edge of the color circle which is exactly what is described in the image Andy has posted twice (http://www.8052.com/forum/read/176591) and is also exactly what happens if using Michael Karas second Excel solution (http://www.8052.com/forum/read/176593).

So please will you now start to play this in a practical way.

Do read through all commends you have received in this thread.

Then start acting on the advice you have received.

Do get back if there is something you don't understand, but then do as many times suggested: Concentrate on giving a real description about what problem you are having and what you are trying to accomplish instead of making posts that just gives rise to new questions.

Right now, your attention span seems to be miniscule. You have constantly refused to tell what you think you should use your color selector to. It doesn't matter what permutation of colors you have in your table. A combined color selector will still not:
- allow a meaningful walk through different colors like the video
- allow a nice change from color A to color B
- take into account the difference between changing color value, color purity or light intensity.

And you have said that you don't need smooth color changes, but have explicitly said that "that way is good for me" about the video that animates the colors with smoth color gradients.

A lamp that randomly walks through a lot of strange colors whenever you turn it on (walk from black through 123 intermediate colors until reaching white) is useless.

A lamp that allows the user to select a color should have an interface that is intiutive, which means that it should use RGB or HSV to let the user select three parameters individually instead of just pressing "next" and "prev" to step through an unknown number of color alternatives - sometimes getting more light, and sometimes less light while maybe somewhere find the wanted blue hue.

A lamp that switches color on it's own should separate light intensity from color, so that the user may select the intensity and the lamp then changes hues without changing the general intensity.

I'm not sure, but I think your problem is that you for the life of you can't understand that you are talking about a three-dimensional selection problem. At the same time, you are ignoring that our eyes have big limitations when it comes to identifying unique colors (which is a great advantage since our brain autocalibrates itself based on surrounding color temperature. We can see "white" at high noon but still see things at white when lit by a very red sun just before sunset) while we are very sensitive to relative color changes. The eye is designed to span a huge dynamic range between pitch black and blinding white, but we are hunters with good capacity for edge-detection to allow us to see camouflaged objects.

Physiological and psychological processes in your brains demands that a designer must take the viewer into account when working with coloring or lighting. This thread has 94 posts and you still haven't told us what "product" you are trying to design. If you don't even know yourself, then it is obviously impossible to discuss functionallity, usability, perception, ...

The quality of any answers you can get is 99.9% controlled by how well you are managing to focus on what your goal is. Right now, it can best be summed up as: "You, Chico, have not understood what you, Chico, wants." Until you understand what your needs are, it doesn't help if you write that we don't understand what you want/need.