Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/03/09 13:51
Read: times


 
#168722 - Do you think this applies to things you can't see?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil said:
BMW & Mercedes are "expensive" - but plenty of people seem prepared to pay for them.

It's not just about "quality" or "performance" - it's also about whether people think the "image" or "brand" is worth paying for...


I remember the '80's, when folks boasted about how costly their sneakers were, and didn't mention whether they were comfortable. I remember, too, taking at least two of the five BMW owners on my team to/from the dealer because their BMW was in the shop ... again. As for me ... I wore those ultra-lightweight Rockport wingtips to work. They were light, had soft soles, and though they cost well over $100 a pair, which, then, was quite a bit for a pair of shoes for work, were well worth the cost and tolerating the short sole-life, as compared with those 3-pounds-each Florsheims I got in '63, and still have.

However, while I do believe that people pay for image, and cellphones, iPods, and the like have proven that people are happy to pay lots for things that work just a little, in order to have the image-value of having the "kewl" toys, whether they really work properly or not, I seriously doubt that applies to the components within them. Features, maybe parts, probably not.

The "Alte, Deutsche Wertarbeit" isn't what it once was, either. I recall once (actually three times) taking a colleague to the BMW repair shop to have each of the three fuel pumps in his 3-series BMW replaced. Clearly a case of overengineering, since other, apparently more reliable cars, like mine, seemed to get by with just one, and mine have never failed, though I'm on my fourth Nissan Maxima in 21 years.

Somewhere in all this, I'd bet there's a bit of wisdom, though I have yet to ferret it out, exactly. I rather imagine it applies to things other than automobiles as well, though.

RE





List of 63 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
is it sad or is it wonderful?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Confucious            01/01/70 00:00      
   It's due to loss of rigor in the product development cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
      strawman again.            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's where the problem lies ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      A good aim, but unachievable in practice?            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's a cultural artifact            01/01/70 00:00      
            I can imagine Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
               you haven't answered the question, Jez            01/01/70 00:00      
                  erm, dunno            01/01/70 00:00      
            Second to MArket            01/01/70 00:00      
               They didn't do that during that era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Bismarck was quite efficient            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's a poor tradeoff, security against schedule            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Quantity and quality seldom combinable            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Please do get your facts straight, Per            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Don't ignore psychology            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Cannon ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The Dora, possibly.            01/01/70 00:00      
            not my quote, but in some article I read ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Too expensive is the killer, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Price is not everything            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Do you think this applies to things you can't see?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not so often            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That would have no impact at all, but for the sticker            01/01/70 00:00      
      mental hardware guy            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, you fit my model of a software guy            01/01/70 00:00      
            huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Big generation issue            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You're right ... I'm not            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Richard likes his random pseudo facts            01/01/70 00:00      
                        My situation is not like yours, Per            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's an extraordinary working arrangement, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I don't dislike the land-line phone ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 on phone etc.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the inventor of the cellphone could have made a fortune            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    This is what's evolved over the decades.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Sounding quite sad            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I'm not trying to grow a labor pool            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You are ignoring the value of feedback            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I'm not at all sure I agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Still thinking a developer will reach a magic 100% level            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          The customer is always right            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Definitely a lesson there            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Perhaps, but they're one in a billion.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not everyone fits in every organization.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: not everyone ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Erlacher Logic            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Now when did I say that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Apparently you can't pick up on the subtleties ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   well..            01/01/70 00:00      
   In fact            01/01/70 00:00      
   So yeah            01/01/70 00:00      
      That IS a problem, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dice?            01/01/70 00:00      
      used for gambling...            01/01/70 00:00      
      http://www.dice.com            01/01/70 00:00      
   Devolution            01/01/70 00:00      
   2 wrongs make a right?            01/01/70 00:00      
   One of the major problems we have            01/01/70 00:00      
      Design-for-test is the answer            01/01/70 00:00      
         you are quite right Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
            "Proven-Product" syndrome            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List