Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/02/09 15:17
Read: times


 
#168702 - Bismarck was quite efficient
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hasn't most historical document shown that the Bismarck (I assume you talk about the ship, and not the person) was quite well-built and quite well-functioning.

The big problem with Bismarck was that it got too long from home, with no air superiority cover and no destroyers that could keep up. It doesn't help to have an excellent chain link, if the other links are not just as good.

One thing to note that on the market, many companies often start at a similar time to create a new product. Often, it is the general availability of a new technology that makes a new product feasible - either from a technical or economical point. When several companies starts at the same time, it is important to be first. Looking at WW2 Germany is something completely different. Germany did start to design and build in a number of areas for a number of years before starting the war, while a number of politicians in other countries either looked in another direction or was too stupid to add 1+1 together. Bismarck was well over 50000 ton, fully loaded, which was much bigger than allowed by agreements made at the ending of WW1.

Another thing: Before they got sunk, both Bismarck and Tirpitz managed quite well to scare the allied convoys almost to death. They took very, very long routes around locations where Bismarck or Tirpitz was rumoured to be, sometimes delaying a convoy by one or more weeks. And the allied forces had to invest tremendous resources to try to track down the two ships (and keep their convoys alive).

No, I don't think you should count Bismarck or Tirpitz as big and blunt monuments instead of very efficient war machines.

Next thing is of course that both US and Russia got their hands on a lot of German scientists at the end of the war. Leaks or no leaks - I think Russia would have got their nuclear capabilities anyway. Maybe three to five years later, but that wouldn't have made too much of a difference. Especially since neither side had equipment to properly supervise the other side. It wasn't so easy to detect the explosion of a smaller nuclear device, when all you could detect and speculate about was weak shock waves that could just as well have been natural.

List of 63 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
is it sad or is it wonderful?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Confucious            01/01/70 00:00      
   It's due to loss of rigor in the product development cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
      strawman again.            01/01/70 00:00      
         That's where the problem lies ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      A good aim, but unachievable in practice?            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's a cultural artifact            01/01/70 00:00      
            I can imagine Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
               you haven't answered the question, Jez            01/01/70 00:00      
                  erm, dunno            01/01/70 00:00      
            Second to MArket            01/01/70 00:00      
               They didn't do that during that era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Bismarck was quite efficient            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's a poor tradeoff, security against schedule            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Quantity and quality seldom combinable            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Please do get your facts straight, Per            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Don't ignore psychology            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Cannon ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The Dora, possibly.            01/01/70 00:00      
            not my quote, but in some article I read ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Too expensive is the killer, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Price is not everything            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Do you think this applies to things you can't see?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not so often            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That would have no impact at all, but for the sticker            01/01/70 00:00      
      mental hardware guy            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, you fit my model of a software guy            01/01/70 00:00      
            huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Big generation issue            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You're right ... I'm not            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Richard likes his random pseudo facts            01/01/70 00:00      
                        My situation is not like yours, Per            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's an extraordinary working arrangement, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I don't dislike the land-line phone ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 on phone etc.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the inventor of the cellphone could have made a fortune            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    This is what's evolved over the decades.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Sounding quite sad            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I'm not trying to grow a labor pool            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You are ignoring the value of feedback            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I'm not at all sure I agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Still thinking a developer will reach a magic 100% level            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          The customer is always right            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Definitely a lesson there            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Perhaps, but they're one in a billion.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not everyone fits in every organization.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  re: not everyone ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Erlacher Logic            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Now when did I say that?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Apparently you can't pick up on the subtleties ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   well..            01/01/70 00:00      
   In fact            01/01/70 00:00      
   So yeah            01/01/70 00:00      
      That IS a problem, isn't it?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dice?            01/01/70 00:00      
      used for gambling...            01/01/70 00:00      
      http://www.dice.com            01/01/70 00:00      
   Devolution            01/01/70 00:00      
   2 wrongs make a right?            01/01/70 00:00      
   One of the major problems we have            01/01/70 00:00      
      Design-for-test is the answer            01/01/70 00:00      
         you are quite right Richard            01/01/70 00:00      
            "Proven-Product" syndrome            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List