Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/10/07 21:13
Modified:
  04/10/07 21:19

Read: times


 
#136943 - My most recent design work
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I really havent had much time to work on my 8052 core design recently, other demands on my time mean that its on a back burner at the moment.
But I have come to the conclusion that a processor core in an FPGA is really only useful if you are doing it for reasons other than pure speed. There are valid reasons for processor cores in FPGAs such as being small, secure and easily customisable but I really wouldnt recomment doing it to try to outperform custom built processor running at 100 Mhz or more because you are never going to win.
My most recent experiance was with a replacement for a pic plus large amounts of random logic, we ditched the pic stuck all the logic in an altera acex device which is not a bga package which is always a good thang and implemented a very simple replacement for the pic with a very cut down 8051 core with no timers,uarts etc.
I dont know whats come over me recently Ive become quite an AVR convert( eeek!!!!) mainly because I like the tool chain for avr-gcc.

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Freebie 8051 cores            01/01/70 00:00      
   They do work to a limited extent, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      there's a range ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         What architecture?            01/01/70 00:00      
            805x, but modified            01/01/70 00:00      
               are you reinventing the wheel?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, but it's worth the trouble            01/01/70 00:00      
                     wrong place to read            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I only looked at their site once ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SiLabs pricing?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's what they had on their website            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Mostly, it's absence of "TFM"            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update            01/01/70 00:00      
   I hate to assume, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      "free" ... I doubt it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK a recollection from a seminar            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe from this convention?            01/01/70 00:00      
   is FPGA a suitable "substrate" for a processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's not as easy as the marketeers say ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         FPGA Software            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGAs work fine for processors for us            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGA-based processors            01/01/70 00:00      
         Shouldn't it do better than 50 MHz?            01/01/70 00:00      
            50 MHz is pretty fast            01/01/70 00:00      
            My most recent design work            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List