Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/07/07 16:35
Modified:
  04/07/07 16:40

Read: times


 
#136795 - They do work to a limited extent, but...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Usualy the ones i have seen available for free have the core functionality but no perhiperals,timers,uarts, interrupts, whatever so its upto you to provide those and plug them in, or in the case of the one core ive seen extensivly rewrite it so that interrupts do actualy work.
The other problems are things like they are not optimised for speed and are written in a way which is not conducive to them being easily edited.
Missing documentaion,no testbenches and lack of support all add up to meaning that taking any of them on involves a lot of work to get them working.Converting them to work as a mutistage pipelined design is not something to be taken lightly.
Having said all that they can be a good starting point for a minimalist core with the potential to be very fast and support only those features that you really need. They are not for beginners and dont be surprised if they dont actualy do what they say on the tin because quite often they are abandonware which somebody has simply given up on.

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Freebie 8051 cores            01/01/70 00:00      
   They do work to a limited extent, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      there's a range ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         What architecture?            01/01/70 00:00      
            805x, but modified            01/01/70 00:00      
               are you reinventing the wheel?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, but it's worth the trouble            01/01/70 00:00      
                     wrong place to read            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I only looked at their site once ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SiLabs pricing?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's what they had on their website            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Mostly, it's absence of "TFM"            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update            01/01/70 00:00      
   I hate to assume, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      "free" ... I doubt it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK a recollection from a seminar            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe from this convention?            01/01/70 00:00      
   is FPGA a suitable "substrate" for a processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's not as easy as the marketeers say ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         FPGA Software            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGAs work fine for processors for us            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGA-based processors            01/01/70 00:00      
         Shouldn't it do better than 50 MHz?            01/01/70 00:00      
            50 MHz is pretty fast            01/01/70 00:00      
            My most recent design work            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List