Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/09/07 20:41
Read: times


 
#136878 - FPGA-based processors
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jan Waclawek said:
I am not much of FPGA/CPLD, but I cooperate with my colleague who just squeezed a design from two big CPLDs into a single small FPGA, but had a lot of #$%^ing around... His concern was mainly of the timing and troubles with wide combinatorial logic (adders and decoders and bus-wide multiplexers).


Guess it all depends on what the design was doing, and what FPGA he was using. I remember fighting to get a VME design to meet the 80 MHz timespec in an XC4013E back in the day.

Right now, I'm doing a Spartan 3E thing and I've got no problem meeting 66 MHz timing with ns to spare. One side of a dual-port runs at 133 MHz, too, without issues (clock doubling using the DCM).

I can't imagine that it'd be difficult meeting, say, a 50 MHz clock requirement for an 8051 core in a 3E.

-a

List of 26 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Freebie 8051 cores            01/01/70 00:00      
   They do work to a limited extent, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
      there's a range ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         What architecture?            01/01/70 00:00      
            805x, but modified            01/01/70 00:00      
               are you reinventing the wheel?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, but it's worth the trouble            01/01/70 00:00      
                     wrong place to read            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I only looked at their site once ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SiLabs pricing?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        That's what they had on their website            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Mostly, it's absence of "TFM"            01/01/70 00:00      
   OP Update            01/01/70 00:00      
   I hate to assume, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      "free" ... I doubt it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK a recollection from a seminar            01/01/70 00:00      
            Maybe from this convention?            01/01/70 00:00      
   is FPGA a suitable "substrate" for a processor?            01/01/70 00:00      
      it's not as easy as the marketeers say ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         FPGA Software            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGAs work fine for processors for us            01/01/70 00:00      
      FPGA-based processors            01/01/70 00:00      
         Shouldn't it do better than 50 MHz?            01/01/70 00:00      
            50 MHz is pretty fast            01/01/70 00:00      
            My most recent design work            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List