Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Off-topic

???
10/03/06 21:26
Read: times


 
#125764 - Mr OHM again
Responding to: ???'s previous message
As the Fairchild guys have already pointed out that the majority of bipolar logic, certainly the LSTTL, STLL, and 10KECL are slower than the fastest CMOS of the current era, yet use upward of 6-7 orders of magnitude (that's powers of ten, for those who smoke weed) more power in a static condition, nobody wants to consider bipolar logic either.

Hello again Richard, nice of you to drop by...

Lets look at what you have said above, since current CMOS is getting faster, by faster it means it works at a higher frequency than ever before... and yet these new divices consume less current than ever before. That sounds like, high frequency means less power and not more..., but many here and I re iterate again (sigh!)...
Is electrical power a function of it's frequency???, Mr OHM says no, no , no...if you don't agree with MR OHM then MR maxwell is wrong also since his theory obeys MR OHMS law, Hence, dispite MR OHM not having the latest hp multimeter available to him, I guess we need to see what he has to say,eh!
He sounds like quite a clever guy to me, but course that only my opinion.

Darren

List of 93 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Nmos versus Bipolar(TTL) technology            01/01/70 00:00      
   I remember when cpus were bipolar            01/01/70 00:00      
   NMOS?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Static power consumption            01/01/70 00:00      
      Mr OHM and MR AMPERE            01/01/70 00:00      
         Ohm and Ampere            01/01/70 00:00      
         74LSTTL versus 74HCMOS, as an example            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hi Kai,            01/01/70 00:00      
               Plonk!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  deleted, wrong place            01/01/70 00:00      
               mindless babble            01/01/70 00:00      
                  None taken            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hi Kai,            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do not forget Mr. Real World            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hi there,            01/01/70 00:00      
               Are you trying to get..            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thank you Kalpak....            01/01/70 00:00      
                     impedance            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Hi Terry, thanks for the input....            01/01/70 00:00      
                           what has that to do with the subject you raised            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Hi Terry,            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Becuase it is not DC            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Now we are getting somewhere, thanks to Neil            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       you .... .... why can you not accept            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Wrong Question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 If you find this power vs frequency concept            01/01/70 00:00      
                              nothing, of course            01/01/70 00:00      
         if ignorance is bliss            01/01/70 00:00      
         Could you please clear some points?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hi Kai            01/01/70 00:00      
               put that butt away            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Ehm... trolling a bit?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Ive told you Mr Heywood is            01/01/70 00:00      
               proportional versus f            01/01/70 00:00      
         what transpires is that you are an idiot Darren            01/01/70 00:00      
            a better idea            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hi JEZ,            01/01/70 00:00      
               No I was refering to you being an idiot            01/01/70 00:00      
   It\'s the weed again ... ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hello, it's Darren again...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Speed Power Product            01/01/70 00:00      
            Squares and circles            01/01/70 00:00      
               Schooling            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Hello Ian            01/01/70 00:00      
            Mr OHM and MR AMPERE laws violated??            01/01/70 00:00      
               No, I have better things to do.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  let me try, not that I think it will do any good            01/01/70 00:00      
         nope ... it's CMOS            01/01/70 00:00      
         babble, babble, babble            01/01/70 00:00      
   Power consumption, complexity and size            01/01/70 00:00      
   RC lowpass is used on ALE in some designs            01/01/70 00:00      
      Hello Frieder            01/01/70 00:00      
         one example please of a non-historic device            01/01/70 00:00      
      never seen that            01/01/70 00:00      
   Let's try this            01/01/70 00:00      
      In other words:            01/01/70 00:00      
      say absolutely nothing            01/01/70 00:00      
   App Note Explaining CMOS Power Dissipation            01/01/70 00:00      
      Darren will ignore this            01/01/70 00:00      
      Fair Comment??            01/01/70 00:00      
         impedance is not imps dancing            01/01/70 00:00      
            Microwave Ovens            01/01/70 00:00      
            Dancing AMPS???            01/01/70 00:00      
               You'd best ask an adult to explain this to you.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  why            01/01/70 00:00      
                     what I meant was one local to him            01/01/70 00:00      
               Acceptance            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Course            01/01/70 00:00      
                     but Darren does not have a picture            01/01/70 00:00      
         Think about it this way            01/01/70 00:00      
            oh no            01/01/70 00:00      
            it's also the switching transient ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Mr OHM again            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Mr Idiot again            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Ohm's Law            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Don't be naive Ian            01/01/70 00:00      
            Hi David            01/01/70 00:00      
               sure            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Burning coil            01/01/70 00:00      
                     incorrect stupid babble again            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Are we finally getting somewhere?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Hi Rob            01/01/70 00:00      
                           "pure"            01/01/70 00:00      
                           practice what you preach.            01/01/70 00:00      
               huh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Hi David            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The End.            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well np            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Hi Steve,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Cars            01/01/70 00:00      
                        not even the farthing, I'm sure            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Size            01/01/70 00:00      
               Hey Darren            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List