??? 10/03/06 02:09 Read: times |
#125673 - Hi Terry, Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You might think that way but anyone that understands electronic engineering understands how these things work. it is obvious that you either do not understand or you are just a total waste of time deliberatly wasting forum space. Either way at least take the time to formulate coherant arguments. Terry
My apoligies for perhaps diversifying regarding the ancient greek mathematicians, if you perhaps read all of the threads, we are trying to determine whether electrical frequency is a function or at least proportional to electrical true power dissipation. Ohms law doesn't appear to say anything regarding frequency being related to true power dissipation. In otherwords and assuming I have fixed amplititude but at the same time, vary a time dependent electrical wave ( of any shape or form rich in harmonics or not, it doesn't matter) low frequency then increase it's frequency, does the power or energy in that wave increase or decrease or stay the same regardless of changing frequency? MR OHM and MR AMPERE tell me it will stay the same. There are some on this thread who disagree with MR OHM and MR AMPERE's laws, please read the threads. If we can irradicate this riddle, then maybe we can press ahead and try and figure out why slow NMOS is prefered over fast bipolar technology where LSI cpu fabrication is concerned. Clearly, high speed (high frequency clock drive) 8052's appear to be desirable. Since bipolar technology is available why dont chip manufactures use it? Darren Darren |