??? 10/31/09 09:20 Modified: 10/31/09 09:23 Read: times |
#170273 - Agreed - what a rubbish paper! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
"better than PID" and singularly fails to demonstrate it in the ^&£*£*&*(£ paper ! Not even a bloody graph showing a "PID" system, and their neural net system Agreed - they say, 5 Conclusions
Testing of the MFA controller adaptation and its comparison to a classic PID controller... But there is no comparison to a classic PID controller! The paper shouldn't even have been published with such a gaping hole as that! They also haven't demonstrated that their system actually works in real life - it is all just a simulation! There is no proof that the simulation is valid! They also haven't given any consideration of the relative cost, complexity, ease-of-use, etc of the 2 techniques. Maybe their system is good - but this paper has singularly failed to show that! |