??? 07/23/09 15:20 Read: times |
#167755 - non-sequitur Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
'C' isn't quicker for us, here, because it's got to work with hardware we already have in hand. The fact that the hardware is already in hand is, surely, irrelevant? The point is, presumably, that you already have the software "drivers" for that hardware? If you had no pre-existing software, then it's highly likely 'C' would be quicker. |