Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
02/21/08 14:32
Modified:
  02/21/08 14:35
Read: times


 		 #151251 - Well... again
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Jon Ledbetter said:


Erik Malund said:

I'm kind of aginst this.

How does these abbreviations harmonize with the forum rule "no SMS" e.g. LOL is SMS usage.

is it logical to state LOL = laughing out loud; ur = an insult to the reader?

Erik




http://8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=148380

I don't know, you tell me.


Jon


I want to add to this Malund you did used abbreviation LOL here :http://www.8052.com/forumchat/read.phtml?id=151034

should I call this double standard?


AP





List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Noob Guide Revision            01/01/70 00:00      
   OTOH            01/01/70 00:00      
      ROTFL            01/01/70 00:00      
   stuff            01/01/70 00:00      
      it does not            01/01/70 00:00      
   I'm kind of aginst this            01/01/70 00:00      
      SMS vs abbreviations            01/01/70 00:00      
         exactly            01/01/70 00:00      
         Where there's a will there's a way            01/01/70 00:00      
            a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
            Planned            01/01/70 00:00      
               Naughty-word eliminator            01/01/70 00:00      
                  we were approached on this and did a long analysis            01/01/70 00:00      
                     It's all about where you draw the line            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Banned words            01/01/70 00:00      
               What about Taunts            01/01/70 00:00      
   Please be considerate of the non-native-language..            01/01/70 00:00      
      Or, at least...            01/01/70 00:00      
         one way, I have used in a few cases            01/01/70 00:00      
      Abbreviations are bad            01/01/70 00:00      
   Well...            01/01/70 00:00      
      nope            01/01/70 00:00      
         Nobody said this would be easy            01/01/70 00:00      
         Missed the point            01/01/70 00:00      
      Well... again            01/01/70 00:00      
         no 'double standard'            01/01/70 00:00      
            I would go with Erik we are not using mobile            01/01/70 00:00      
         Mode of Address            01/01/70 00:00      
            There is a little confusion            01/01/70 00:00      
               Confusion !            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Nothing formal            01/01/70 00:00      
               I thought I made it clear            01/01/70 00:00      
   You should include a link to this!            01/01/70 00:00      
      I will            01/01/70 00:00      
      Excellent            01/01/70 00:00      
         catch-22            01/01/70 00:00      
            JFGI            01/01/70 00:00      
               I did...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Ah            01/01/70 00:00      
            The link is good but            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List