Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/13/06 00:30
Read: times


 
#122135 - Unrelated questions
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Ammar Ahmed said:
kindly tell me something about
1. TIMER FLAG 1 and TIMER FLAG 0?

As Erik says, these are described in the so-called "bible" for the 8051.

2. What is the diference between SERIAL port and PRALLEL port?

A serial port handles data bits serially; ie, one bit at a time, in sequence;
A parallel port hanldes data bits in parallel; ie, all bits of a word simultaneously.

The advantage of a serial port is that it takes less hardware - the same hardware (driver, pin, wire, receiver) is used for each bit in turn; the disadvantage is that the data has to be dismantled into individual bits for transmission, then reassembled on reception, and the transmission takes longer.

The advantage of a parallel port is that a complete word is transmitted in one go - without dismantling or reassembling - so it's quicker; the disadvantage is that it takes more hardware - one driver, pin, wire, and receiver for each bit.

3. What is meant by GATE = 0 and GATE = 1?

Err... exactly what part of this don't you understand?
What is the context?

4. I have studied in a book that the following function gives one second delay in a microcontroller..

Either you have grossly over-simplified what the book said - to the point of omitting essential details - or the book is rubbish.

5. difference between 13BIT TIMER and 16 BIT TIMER?

Err... 3 bits?!

Again, exactly what part of this don't you understand?
What is the context?


List of 72 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
control intensity of LED's            01/01/70 00:00      
   parallel post            01/01/70 00:00      
      Micro            01/01/70 00:00      
         pp1            01/01/70 00:00      
            Craig, we NEED a spell-checker!            01/01/70 00:00      
               That'd block all Erik's posts, then ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well, what would that hurt?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Super large dictionary            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Those are "out there"            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Some problems I see...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        True enough ... nothing's perfect            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Homonyms            01/01/70 00:00      
                              exactly!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 spell-checker            01/01/70 00:00      
               No no no no no            01/01/70 00:00      
                  what a colourful reply.            01/01/70 00:00      
   You might have better success....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Options            01/01/70 00:00      
         can be very much simpler            01/01/70 00:00      
            Insuficient Data for Proper Anlysis Captian            01/01/70 00:00      
            mistakes            01/01/70 00:00      
   can you say \"duty cycle\"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Very unsafe!            01/01/70 00:00      
         duty cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
            Do some thinking...            01/01/70 00:00      
               _________            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Back to basics            01/01/70 00:00      
                     more basics            01/01/70 00:00      
                  you have to crawl before you walk            01/01/70 00:00      
                     code            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Checking code            01/01/70 00:00      
                           answers            01/01/70 00:00      
                              You didn't read the instructions!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 if you can't read and follow instructions, I doubt            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    please, pretty please ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    who gives a friggin\' hoot            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Eh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       hardware problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Logic?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             done!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                interrupt of 8051.. question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   no way            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Unrelated questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   not studied microcontroller            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Hardware questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          you just created an 'advanced blinky'            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          What the hell??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             about the 10th time in this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             This guy doesn't even have the basics ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         The general priciples, maybe, but specifics, NO!            01/01/70 00:00      
   u.....you            01/01/70 00:00      
      again            01/01/70 00:00      
         the dead esy way            01/01/70 00:00      
            Tut, tut, Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
               ok, guilty as charged, and a no            01/01/70 00:00      
               fonts!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  well, if the OP took the time to follow the link,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Not so sure            01/01/70 00:00      
            Cunning            01/01/70 00:00      
               in addition            01/01/70 00:00      
         ???            01/01/70 00:00      
   writing in "c "or in assembly            01/01/70 00:00      
      no need to SHOUT, it is annoying            01/01/70 00:00      
      Compilers; writing code            01/01/70 00:00      
         all-cap's helps in other ways            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List