Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/14/06 21:18
Read: times


 
#120277 - Some problems I see...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
is you have lots of people coming here already struggling with the english language. You're not going to allow a post with typos or something that may look like SMS, so this poor fellow is going to spend a couple of hours looking in a dictionary to try and find a word that's not spelled right. Let's take for example the word "knowledge" and he has spelled it "noledge", he's not going to look under K because it sounds like it starts with N. Well we know he's not going to find it under K, so after 5 words or so... he's probably going to give up. Just ran him off instead of getting a new member.

You could have suggested words, but that just added another increase to the horsepower required.

Yes, words can be added to a dictionary, but who's going to do that? The moderators, so they'll need to be available 24/7 until all the words are straighted out. "Hey Craig, your damned spell checker won't take my new AT89SST52 chip name, so now I can't give all the information I need to. Can you fix it for me?"

Then there are words like "know" and "no" that I've seen spelled "now", and a spelling checker would go right past that because it doesn't know context.

Yes it could be done, with added cost for a new server fast enough to check one of your 1000 word postings and still keep serving up information to (a guess here) an average of 50 users at the same time.

I'd say a quick scan of a post for the most common SMS "terms" might work alot easier and faster.

Jon

List of 72 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
control intensity of LED's            01/01/70 00:00      
   parallel post            01/01/70 00:00      
      Micro            01/01/70 00:00      
         pp1            01/01/70 00:00      
            Craig, we NEED a spell-checker!            01/01/70 00:00      
               That'd block all Erik's posts, then ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Well, what would that hurt?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Super large dictionary            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Those are "out there"            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Some problems I see...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        True enough ... nothing's perfect            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Homonyms            01/01/70 00:00      
                              exactly!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 spell-checker            01/01/70 00:00      
               No no no no no            01/01/70 00:00      
                  what a colourful reply.            01/01/70 00:00      
   You might have better success....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Options            01/01/70 00:00      
         can be very much simpler            01/01/70 00:00      
            Insuficient Data for Proper Anlysis Captian            01/01/70 00:00      
            mistakes            01/01/70 00:00      
   can you say \"duty cycle\"?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Very unsafe!            01/01/70 00:00      
         duty cycle            01/01/70 00:00      
            Do some thinking...            01/01/70 00:00      
               _________            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Back to basics            01/01/70 00:00      
                     more basics            01/01/70 00:00      
                  you have to crawl before you walk            01/01/70 00:00      
                     code            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Checking code            01/01/70 00:00      
                           answers            01/01/70 00:00      
                              You didn't read the instructions!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 if you can't read and follow instructions, I doubt            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    please, pretty please ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    who gives a friggin\' hoot            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 i tried but a problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Eh?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       hardware problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Logic?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             done!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                interrupt of 8051.. question            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   no way            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Unrelated questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   not studied microcontroller            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Hardware questions            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          you just created an 'advanced blinky'            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          What the hell??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             about the 10th time in this thread            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             This guy doesn't even have the basics ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         The general priciples, maybe, but specifics, NO!            01/01/70 00:00      
   u.....you            01/01/70 00:00      
      again            01/01/70 00:00      
         the dead esy way            01/01/70 00:00      
            Tut, tut, Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
               ok, guilty as charged, and a no            01/01/70 00:00      
               fonts!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  well, if the OP took the time to follow the link,            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Not so sure            01/01/70 00:00      
            Cunning            01/01/70 00:00      
               in addition            01/01/70 00:00      
         ???            01/01/70 00:00      
   writing in "c "or in assembly            01/01/70 00:00      
      no need to SHOUT, it is annoying            01/01/70 00:00      
      Compilers; writing code            01/01/70 00:00      
         all-cap's helps in other ways            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List