Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/29/11 00:54
Read: times


 
#184418 - You don't seriously believe that, do you?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
If a guy builds his own linker that allows code to be loaded and executed at 0x0000 rather than 0x0800 or wherever, do you really think he's got access to the entire package? I doubt it. He hasn't at that point got anything except a way to load his code into a particular MCU with a memory model incompatible with the demo package's output.

If the vendor had seen to it that there were a way to accommodate the up-do-date device repertoire, this wouldn't even have come up.

Erik said:
The above would be true if you had done this one-on-one; however, you have possibly "guided" some unscroupolous person that were otherwise "likely to buy a multi-k-$ compiler"


I disagree ... mainly because the unscrupulous individuals who might otherwise have to buy a costly software suite such as the one under discussion would not buy it under any circumstances, hence, the vendor has lost nothing. Further, if the unscrupulous individuals who might attempt this were both smart and diligent and skilled enough, which experience has taught me they generally are not, and, if they were not too lazy to do such work, which experience has taught me that they typically are, they'd (a) have thought of this themselves, as it's not rocket science, and (b)would never do it because it's too much work and, having done the work, they'd still not have access to the full tool set.

RE

List of 53 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Linking C programs with Keil evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
   Eval Tools.            01/01/70 00:00      
      That makes sense            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's not that much more useable            01/01/70 00:00      
            Work-around for evaluation version limitations?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Marked -1            01/01/70 00:00      
               I'm not so sure you're right here ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Irrelevant if people have ideas - should they be debated?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     There's a reason I haven't done it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Would not represent a valid evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Wait a minute ... You've got this wrong ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     One question            01/01/70 00:00      
                        What about the guy who simply wants to evaluate the product?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           sometimes coding situations and requirements differ            01/01/70 00:00      
                        How would you like it?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's not what I'm asking them to do            01/01/70 00:00      
                              A message from the OP.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 I don't supply the compiler ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Wrong view on evaluation tools            01/01/70 00:00      
                           as I've said before, where you sit determines what you see            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Still failing to recognize reason for hole in code map            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 You missed my point again            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Simulate or use Logic Analyser            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       ramblings            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Using evaluation software and hardware            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          The above would be true if....            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             You don't seriously believe that, do you?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                A thief is a thief            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Indeed...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   FIrst of all, I don't advocate theivery            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      and more mumbo jumbo in the reply            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Can _you_ not read debugger output?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          8255            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Yes, but they're still shipped on some 805x trainer boards            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Just sayin'            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Square Wheels for the Car            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I disagree ... not that that should surprise anyone            01/01/70 00:00      
                        eval and evaluation            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Yes, if only they were useful ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Also "LPC900 Studio"            01/01/70 00:00      
         They all seem crippled            01/01/70 00:00      
            comments            01/01/70 00:00      
            They all seem crippled            01/01/70 00:00      
               Yes ... SDCC ... the obvious solution            01/01/70 00:00      
                  what's obvious about it            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Why not?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        reasons            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Unfortunately            01/01/70 00:00      
                              re Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 15 years ago?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    OK, maybe not            01/01/70 00:00      
            reasonable price            01/01/70 00:00      
            raisonance is 4k with no code offset            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List