| Linking C programs with Keil evaluation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Eval Tools. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That makes sense | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's not that much more useable | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Work-around for evaluation version limitations? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Marked -1 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm not so sure you're right here ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Irrelevant if people have ideas - should they be debated? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There's a reason I haven't done it ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Would not represent a valid evaluation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Wait a minute ... You've got this wrong ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| One question | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What about the guy who simply wants to evaluate the product? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| sometimes coding situations and requirements differ | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How would you like it? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's not what I'm asking them to do | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A message from the OP. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't supply the compiler ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Wrong view on evaluation tools | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| as I've said before, where you sit determines what you see | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Still failing to recognize reason for hole in code map | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You missed my point again | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Simulate or use Logic Analyser | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ramblings | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Using evaluation software and hardware | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The above would be true if.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You don't seriously believe that, do you? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A thief is a thief | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Indeed... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| FIrst of all, I don't advocate theivery | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and more mumbo jumbo in the reply | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Can _you_ not read debugger output? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 8255 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, but they're still shipped on some 805x trainer boards | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just sayin' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Square Wheels for the Car | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I disagree ... not that that should surprise anyone | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| eval and evaluation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, if only they were useful ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Also "LPC900 Studio" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| They all seem crippled | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| comments | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| They all seem crippled | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes ... SDCC ... the obvious solution | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what's obvious about it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why not? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| reasons | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Unfortunately | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| re Keil | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 15 years ago? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OK, maybe not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| reasonable price | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| raisonance is 4k with no code offset | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
