??? 04/18/11 23:04 Read: times |
#181943 - I believe that's an implementation problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The most "productive", meaning work product out for user effort in, VHDL is DOS-based. That quickly makes it 10-100x as effective and productive as a Windows based alternative. In some implementations, it's quick to compile and easily linked to a simulator to show you your mistakes ... which, after all, is why one does that ... right? I one truly widely used implementation, it takes multiple steps under Windows, meaning multiple mouse-clicks, followed by selection (and more mouse clicks) of a path through the morasse, and ultimately a path to a simulator, while another equally popular Windows version simply requires a single mouse-click, or maybe two, to produce your simulator output right on the screen, in graphic format, in front of you. I wonder what twisted logic supports the use of the former.
RE |