??? 10/17/08 19:29 Read: times |
#159167 - Not that generic! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
If EPROM is now a generic term, how's one to interpret whether it's an EPROM, EEPROM, FLASH, SEEPROM, NVRAM, FRAM, MRAM, or whatever? What do you mean by SEEPROM? But NVRAM, FRAM, and MRAM are not ROM at all - so the problem doesn't arise! But it does raise another issue: "RAM" simply stands for Random Access Memory (as distinct from sequential access memory); it doesn't actually say anything about whether it is read-only, or read-write - and neither doesn it actually say anything about whether the storage is volatile or not... ;-) |