??? 10/17/08 07:04 Read: times |
#159131 - Not wrong. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No mention of UV.
And no mention of EPROM, either! It's an EEPROM, not an EPROM. |
??? 10/17/08 07:04 Read: times |
#159131 - Not wrong. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
No mention of UV.
And no mention of EPROM, either! It's an EEPROM, not an EPROM. |