| 2009 Embedded Systems Conference Trip Report | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 8051 dead? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I have heard that before | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| quoting Samuel Clemens | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not dead, but not sexy? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Ramtron? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why is their part so much faster ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it runs out of FLASH, not FRAM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Which rather kills their own claims for FRAM? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| width of program memory | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 4 times as fast | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It might have to be wider | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Memory acceleration a growing problem | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Branch prediction? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| all these techniques... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's why I like the Maxim/Dallas parts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| In that case, BP was optional. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes, it's the good news, that it's possible at all | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Dead? Keil (an ARM company) don't think so! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's still their goal ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| native-mode environment | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| cross-compilation is king | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't follow ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Follow | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I still don't know what you meant, Andy ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Cheap native compiler normally equals cheap cross-compiler | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm told GCC is about the best there is ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It makes little sense | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm told that it may not be... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Now I'm confused! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I guess it's just a matter of preference. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Still unsure what your "it" was | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the IT is in the full implementation. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| $40 evb's for a fully-implemented ARM | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Normally compiling on a PC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Will $49 do? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| €39 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| STR9-comSTICK | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, the goal is to leave the PC out of the picture | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| rephrase | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I must admit, that is quite true ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, not quite ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Full complement | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Careful, now! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What I meant ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ... which is in turn good news for the chipmakers... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I just bought a new hot-water-heater that's 'net free | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes, we know you love that old stuff ;-) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| old-stuff? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| W2 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Windows for ARM...? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| EEEEEEK! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I knew you'd like it! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There's already a Windows for ARM. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ARM for cheap | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Cheap ARM vs Expensive 8052 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The cheapest ARM chips can be had for $1 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| For hobbyists | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's getting to be that way, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, that one is pretty close | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Don't lock down memory size - just think "good enough" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No, it should NOT be just that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| All depending on product and actual product usage | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| TI buys Luminary | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Detail (updated) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What's it like to be taken-over by TI? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Burr-Brown | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Another update for your "family tree"... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| TI had benchmarq too | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| who ate whom | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Benchmarq -> Unitrode -> TI | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
