Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/15/09 19:23
Read: times


 
#164630 - All depending on product and actual product usage
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Richard Erlacher said:
Typical product lifespan, these days, is about three years. If the product works as intended, then maintainability isn't an issue if the product works properly. If it has to be changed within the three year product life, well, it's badly designed/debugged/tested and the people in charge, and the product itself, should be replaced.

You have to take platform products into account. These may be used with a very wide range of softwares, or may be reengineered slightly and rebranded to multiple customers.

They may start out as generic platforms that are reasonably good at several things. But if you get a request for k volumes you may decide to tweak the AD section to get two extra bits of resolution, or maybe switch to a processor with more RAM to perform some analysis locally or you may get a customer that would like an extra CAN interface...

I do a lot of work with products where you have to wait three years and look back to know what the actual usages was. So developing a new product, I have to spend a lot of time guessing what will be good design choices and what parts of the product that should be kept reasonably cheap because of less customer interest.

This makes it interesting to select a relatively cheap processor that has pin-compatible big brothers available just in case.

List of 71 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
2009 Embedded Systems Conference Trip Report            01/01/70 00:00      
   8051 dead?            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have heard that before            01/01/70 00:00      
         quoting Samuel Clemens            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not dead, but not sexy?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ramtron?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why is their part so much faster ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         it runs out of FLASH, not FRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
            Which rather kills their own claims for FRAM?            01/01/70 00:00      
            width of program memory            01/01/70 00:00      
               4 times as fast            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It might have to be wider            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Memory acceleration a growing problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Branch prediction?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        all these techniques...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That's why I like the Maxim/Dallas parts            01/01/70 00:00      
                           In that case, BP was optional.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              yes, it's the good news, that it's possible at all            01/01/70 00:00      
   Dead? Keil (an ARM company) don't think so!            01/01/70 00:00      
      That's still their goal ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         native-mode environment            01/01/70 00:00      
            cross-compilation is king            01/01/70 00:00      
            I don't follow ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Follow            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I still don't know what you meant, Andy ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Cheap native compiler normally equals cheap cross-compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm told GCC is about the best there is ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           It makes little sense            01/01/70 00:00      
                           I'm told that it may not be...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Now I'm confused!            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I guess it's just a matter of preference.            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Still unsure what your "it" was            01/01/70 00:00      
                              the IT is in the full implementation.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 $40 evb's for a fully-implemented ARM            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Normally compiling on a PC            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Will $49 do?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       €39            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          STR9-comSTICK            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Well, the goal is to leave the PC out of the picture            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                rephrase            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I must admit, that is quite true ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Well, not quite ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Full complement            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Careful, now!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    What I meant ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         ... which is in turn good news for the chipmakers...            01/01/70 00:00      
            I just bought a new hot-water-heater that's 'net free            01/01/70 00:00      
               yes, we know you love that old stuff ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
                  old-stuff?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  W2            01/01/70 00:00      
         Windows for ARM...?            01/01/70 00:00      
            EEEEEEK!            01/01/70 00:00      
               I knew you'd like it!            01/01/70 00:00      
            There's already a Windows for ARM.            01/01/70 00:00      
   ARM for cheap            01/01/70 00:00      
      Cheap ARM vs Expensive 8052            01/01/70 00:00      
         The cheapest ARM chips can be had for $1            01/01/70 00:00      
            For hobbyists            01/01/70 00:00      
         It's getting to be that way, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, that one is pretty close            01/01/70 00:00      
         Don't lock down memory size - just think "good enough"            01/01/70 00:00      
            No, it should NOT be just that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               All depending on product and actual product usage            01/01/70 00:00      
   TI buys Luminary            01/01/70 00:00      
      Detail (updated)            01/01/70 00:00      
      What's it like to be taken-over by TI?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Burr-Brown            01/01/70 00:00      
            Another update for your "family tree"...            01/01/70 00:00      
               TI had benchmarq too            01/01/70 00:00      
               who ate whom            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Benchmarq -> Unitrode -> TI            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List