Email:
Password:
Remember Me |
Create Account
(Free)
Consulting Services
The 8052.com Book
Message Forum
8052 Forum
Chat Board
Forum Rules (Read!)
Tutorials
Tutorials Index
8051/8052 Tutorial
16-Bit Math
LCD Programming
8051 Instruction Set
News
Back to Subject List
Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/03/08 04:07
Read: times
#155426
- It was Neil Kurzman...
Responding to: ???'s
previous message
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=113613
Kai
List of 48 messages in thread
Topic
Author
Date
Looking for a 80XX chip with build in Watch Dog
01/01/70 00:00
Complex?
01/01/70 00:00
they are legio
01/01/70 00:00
Rx2, 66x, LPC, 80F ...
01/01/70 00:00
you will easily recognize
01/01/70 00:00
Ateml
01/01/70 00:00
probably
01/01/70 00:00
Why is the power unstable?
01/01/70 00:00
ANY certificate is NO absolute guarantee...
01/01/70 00:00
Have you ever been involved in CE testing?
01/01/70 00:00
oh, how many times have that been the case
01/01/70 00:00
why do you use WD then?
01/01/70 00:00
Recovery
01/01/70 00:00
A quote from "The Firmware Handbook":
01/01/70 00:00
the fallacy of 'testing'
01/01/70 00:00
why redesign
01/01/70 00:00
'normal' is where it is to be located
01/01/70 00:00
depends on the circumstances
01/01/70 00:00
reduced
01/01/70 00:00
To calm my boss...
01/01/70 00:00
why would I not know how it works?
01/01/70 00:00
wait a minute ...
01/01/70 00:00
I couldn't agree more...
01/01/70 00:00
I wanted to focus on something different
01/01/70 00:00
Good Design vs. Uncontrollable.
01/01/70 00:00
I am glad I am not your customer
01/01/70 00:00
What you CAN do
01/01/70 00:00
and
01/01/70 00:00
but it might save the engine...
01/01/70 00:00
neither will a watchdog qualify ....
01/01/70 00:00
It was Neil Kurzman...
01/01/70 00:00
watch the dog
01/01/70 00:00
Yes, I agree with you
01/01/70 00:00
I know that it is not a good resolution.
01/01/70 00:00
I wish I can do that
01/01/70 00:00
I think you need another job
01/01/70 00:00
Try googling "SEPIC"
01/01/70 00:00
one of many
01/01/70 00:00
It's a type, not a brand ...
01/01/70 00:00
Try this
01/01/70 00:00
I would recommend against it
01/01/70 00:00
If you have had a look at the datasheet...
01/01/70 00:00
you missed a word
01/01/70 00:00
I've had mixed results ...
01/01/70 00:00
Did you test the LM2674 actually?
01/01/70 00:00
I wouldn't call it testing , but ...
01/01/70 00:00
Are you sure it was the LM2674?
01/01/70 00:00
Well ... as it turns out ...
01/01/70 00:00
Back to Subject List