Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/03/08 02:54
Read: times


 		 #155424 - neither will a watchdog qualify ....
Responding to: ???'s previous message
... as a means of saying "the program works."

If you rely on the watchdog, your program is faulty.

In a previous discussion on this subject someone posted this: "a watchdog is like a fire extinguisher, you should have one, but you hope never to use it", a great way to say it.

Erik



List of 48 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Looking for a 80XX chip with build in Watch Dog            01/01/70 00:00      
   Complex?            01/01/70 00:00      
   they are legio            01/01/70 00:00      
      Rx2, 66x, LPC, 80F ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         you will easily recognize            01/01/70 00:00      
            Ateml            01/01/70 00:00      
               probably            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why is the power unstable?            01/01/70 00:00      
      ANY certificate is NO absolute guarantee...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Have you ever been involved in CE testing?            01/01/70 00:00      
            oh, how many times have that been the case            01/01/70 00:00      
            why do you use WD then?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Recovery            01/01/70 00:00      
                  A quote from "The Firmware Handbook":            01/01/70 00:00      
               the fallacy of 'testing'            01/01/70 00:00      
                  why redesign            01/01/70 00:00      
                     'normal' is where it is to be located            01/01/70 00:00      
                        depends on the circumstances            01/01/70 00:00      
                           reduced            01/01/70 00:00      
               To calm my boss...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  why would I not know how it works?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     wait a minute ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I couldn't agree more...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I wanted to focus on something different            01/01/70 00:00      
   Good Design vs. Uncontrollable.            01/01/70 00:00      
      I am glad I am not your customer            01/01/70 00:00      
      What you CAN do            01/01/70 00:00      
         and            01/01/70 00:00      
            but it might save the engine...            01/01/70 00:00      
               neither will a watchdog qualify ....            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It was Neil Kurzman...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  watch the dog            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Yes, I agree with you            01/01/70 00:00      
            I know that it is not a good resolution.            01/01/70 00:00      
         I wish I can do that            01/01/70 00:00      
            I think you need another job            01/01/70 00:00      
            Try googling "SEPIC"            01/01/70 00:00      
               one of many            01/01/70 00:00      
                  It's a type, not a brand ...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Try this            01/01/70 00:00      
               I would recommend against it            01/01/70 00:00      
                  If you have had a look at the datasheet...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     you missed a word            01/01/70 00:00      
               I've had mixed results ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Did you test the LM2674 actually?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I wouldn't call it testing , but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Are you sure it was the LM2674?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Well ... as it turns out ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List