??? 05/06/10 04:23 Modified: 05/06/10 04:25 Read: times |
#175735 - Thread began with .... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... no indication, WHATSOEVER, that you were discussing a prodution item, for which one failure in 1000 per yar was acceptable in which case the thread would (as it turned to be) about the safety of making it, instead of appempts at perfection and eternal warnings "THIS IS DANGEROUS, DO NOT DO IT" and all kinds of attempts to make 'experimenting' less dangerous, let alone safe (do not do).
Erik, what is the point of suggesting the same solution which is already been published in several Appnotes ? Ironically, this Thread began with reference to an Appnote(of AVR) and the members raised their voice in tandem saying not to trust the Appnotes but the "final solution" suggested to me came from an another Appnote(of NXP). Appnotes are notoriously faulty, but that does not mean they can not provide a start. On one hand the member/s say "do not trust your Appnote" but trust the appnote "i gave" NO, "do not trust your Appnote" still stands, but "use an appnote as a base' can be productive. Also, the triggering in the NXP appnote is far better than in the other two Now, would you still call me shameless, Kai klass ? YES, posing as an amateur to gain info for a job IS shameless I already have found a solution for my problem and am happy that it is not from any appnote or suggestions given by the senior members. There is no way to make it that is not based on (a combination of) the app notes and suggestions. Every approach possible was discussed. Well since you state "I already have found a solution" we can let this dead horse lie. Erik |