??? 09/13/12 21:06 Read: times |
#188319 - Interesting problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
What I'm envisioning, as stated, in part before, is a wand, perhaps 20-25 cm long with probes spaced at perhaps 50 mm spacing along its length, and rotating full-circle about the amputated extremity, with a computer controlling the penetration, possibly open-loop, and monitoring the corresponding pressure.
50mm sounds coarse, and monitoring pressure for penetration sounds backwards. I would use a moving/scanning pivot-arm approach, to get a continual surface record, and set a nominally fixed pressure, and measure the deflection as the pressure point and axis is moved. Something like a nylon wheel on the probe end, would help avoid side-ways sticking effects, and simplify operator control to the level of orbit position. Orbit position could be set with a spin-handle on a gear+track, like http://www.sdp-si.com/web/html/newprdgears3.htm and/or a stepper motor. With an arm design, a rotary encoder+maths can give end-point location, but it is quite distance compliant, and safe. Another track-following quadrature encoder would record where on the orbit-circle the axle was, and a third one could check the spring deflection (or the operator could just manually keep a fixed pressure setting ) So the problem has morphed into 2 or 3 encoders, which are easy to scale and choose, and pressure is nominally fixed per scan. Multiple scans would build up a contour style plot. You can get very fine scan resolution, sub-mm. -jg |