Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/13/12 21:06
Read: times


 
#188319 - Interesting problem
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Richard Erlacher said:
What I'm envisioning, as stated, in part before, is a wand, perhaps 20-25 cm long with probes spaced at perhaps 50 mm spacing along its length, and rotating full-circle about the amputated extremity, with a computer controlling the penetration, possibly open-loop, and monitoring the corresponding pressure.


50mm sounds coarse, and monitoring pressure for penetration sounds backwards.
I would use a moving/scanning pivot-arm approach, to get a continual surface record, and set a nominally fixed pressure, and measure the deflection as the pressure point and axis is moved.

Something like a nylon wheel on the probe end, would help avoid side-ways sticking effects, and simplify operator control to the level of orbit position.
Orbit position could be set with a spin-handle on a gear+track, like
http://www.sdp-si.com/web/html/newprdgears3.htm
and/or a stepper motor.

With an arm design, a rotary encoder+maths can give end-point location, but it is quite distance compliant, and safe.

Another track-following quadrature encoder would record where on the orbit-circle the axle was, and a third one could check the spring deflection (or the operator could just manually keep a fixed pressure setting )

So the problem has morphed into 2 or 3 encoders, which are easy to scale and choose, and pressure is nominally fixed per scan.
Multiple scans would build up a contour style plot.

You can get very fine scan resolution, sub-mm.

-jg

List of 49 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
How would you do this?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I have no idea if this would work, but ....            01/01/70 00:00      
      How would one actuate them?            01/01/70 00:00      
   strain guage            01/01/70 00:00      
      Yes, you might be onto something.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Computer-controlled?            01/01/70 00:00      
            computer controlled            01/01/70 00:00      
               Calibration + redundant force-limitation            01/01/70 00:00      
               Interesting problem            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, it seemed coarse, at first.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Precision is cheap ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I don't follow ...             01/01/70 00:00      
                           Precision            01/01/70 00:00      
                              other considerations            01/01/70 00:00      
         Tomographic imaging?            01/01/70 00:00      
            There's one major problem ... maybe two ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               $100 MRI unit            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I'm not sure ...             01/01/70 00:00      
         Voice coil and LVDT?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not having a lot of experience with this sort of stuff ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               Danger/problems with hydraulic since no spring effect            01/01/70 00:00      
                  A few things puzzle me with this approach            01/01/70 00:00      
   Ultra Sound Probing            01/01/70 00:00      
      Ultra-sound is better for measuring surface or sub-surface            01/01/70 00:00      
   I would not use volumetric imaging            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'm not sure what you mean            01/01/70 00:00      
         another thought            01/01/70 00:00      
            I consider that one of the more "pregnant" approaches            01/01/70 00:00      
               Lots of options available            01/01/70 00:00      
                  You've got to consider cost            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Cost/safety            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Cost target?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        The price target comes from a few prosthetists            01/01/70 00:00      
   comercial CMM            01/01/70 00:00      
      This only received cursory examination             01/01/70 00:00      
         pneumatic actuator            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes ... but what would this cost?            01/01/70 00:00      
               100 rods?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Patient size ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     That's what I'm considering            01/01/70 00:00      
                     AAACK! ... another double post ...             01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's not as big as you think!            01/01/70 00:00      
                     90% coverage            01/01/70 00:00      
                        So maybe vacuum pump for the too fat people            01/01/70 00:00      
   I do not know if this is relevant, but            01/01/70 00:00      
      I'll have to look into this.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Single air pressure sensor sensor for tip force guestimate            01/01/70 00:00      
   What about infrared?            01/01/70 00:00      
      How would you do this so it would retail for under $5k            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List