??? 07/14/09 08:42 Read: times |
#167221 - Good discussion but... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
...
0.1% error is due to difference in nominal value and it is easy to compensate it with calibration coefficients. What is hard to compensate is Tc (expressed in ppm/'c and long term drift expressed in ppm/month). in next few days before I completely ruling out the use of 0.1% resistors I want to explore ideas to minimize those errors. I like the idea of oven. I know a sophisticated oven can cost much more that 0.01% resistors but I'm looking for simple ideas to minimize temperature variations like putting resistors far from high power components, etc. for example how about a fan and a thermostat heat source. about dual slope and integrating date acquisition I really doubt it suits my high sampling rate needs. the question is can I have 14 bit resolutions in 10K sample/Sec ? another issue is even dual slope dose not compensate for Tc of resistors. another problem is about auto-calibration. I need it anyway! let's assume I could sell my units using expen$ive 0.01% resistors. there are other components like resistors in feedback of opamp(usually 1% resistors) that they also determine final offset and scale factors. so I need auto calibration anyway. auto calibration of offset is not difficult. what is difficult is how to auto calibrate the scale. If you have any experience on that please tell me. |